CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 30 juin 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s71AC0EBE { width:17.35pt; display:inline-block } .sD36C3E54 { width:162.93pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 24442/10 Lászlóné DARÁZSI against Hungary and 12 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 30   June 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Egidijus Kūris,   Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 July 2016.   Hasan Bakırcı,   Vincent A. De Gaetano   Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Date of receipt of Government declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]     24442/10 15/04/2010 Lászlóné DARÁZSI 04/02/1966 Tóth István Budapest 27/04/2016 29/02/2016 7,000     6021/12 23/01/2012 Attila József URBÁN 03/09/1957 Borsos Tamás Budapest 05/04/2016 09/03/2016 3,000     6696/12 23/01/2012 Éva BERI 22/06/1954 Borsos Tamás Budapest 05/04/2016 08/03/2016 3,000     10839/12 13/02/2012 József HORVÁTH 28/03/1984 Borsos Tamás Budapest 27/05/2016 04/04/2016 3,000     15540/12 23/02/2012 József ÉLES 15/08/1958 Makó Sándor Kecskemet 10/05/2016 05/04/2016 6,000     25210/12 17/04/2012 József FORGÁCS 07/04/1972 Karsai Dániel András Budapest 10/05/2016 10/05/2016 2,000     34636/12 31/05/2012 Sándor KOTRÁNCZ 10/03/1958 Pfeifer Tamás Budapest 30/05/2016 08/03/2016 5,000     47839/12 24/07/2012 Bernadett ÚJHELYI 01/06/1977 Borsos Tamás Budapest 20/05/2016 15/03/2016 3,000     47888/12 23/07/2012 Csaba Tamás MÁTHÉ 18/05/1973 Borsos Tamás Budapest 14/04/2016 11/03/2016 6,000   58629/12 05/09/2012 István TÓTH 07/06/1958 Borsos Tamás Budapest 24/03/2016 08/03/2016 5,000   60383/12 06/09/2012 László HORJÁN 18/08/1955 Grád András Gusztáv Budapest 20/05/2016 03/03/2016 6,000   64381/12 01/10/2012 László HLAVÁCS 13/07/1952     27/05/2016 08/03/2016 1,300   71459/13 10/11/2013 Imre BERECZK 04/08/1939 Szabó Laura Budakeszi 07/06/2016 10/03/2016 10,000   [i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.