CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 30 juin 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sBF964C40 { width:8.54pt; display:inline-block } .sD7DE76AD { width:201.77pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 46344/08 Nataliya Vasilyevna MAZNENKO against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 30 June 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Faris Vehabović,   Carlo Ranzoni, judges, and Milan Blaško, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 18 September 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mrs Nataliya Vasilyevna Maznenko, is a Ukrainian national, who was born in 1967 and lives in Stayky. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented, most recently, by their Acting Agent, Mrs   O.   Davydchuk. The applicant raised a number of complaints under Articles   6 and 8 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol   No.   1. These complaints were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant by registered post, who was invited to submit her own observations. This letter was delivered to the applicant on 29   January   2015. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letter dated 8   October   2015, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of her observations had expired on 25   February   2015 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. However, no response has been received. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue her application, within the meaning of Article 37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 21 July 2016.   Milan Blaško   Khanlar Hajiyev Deputy Registrar   President