CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 30 juin 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s99A63BFE { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:11pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s79DE5897 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .sBB355983 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s583D00FA { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5362FFEB { width:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .sA2251F55 { width:203.09pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s85E2A1C4 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #949494; border-collapse:collapse } .sD271F6F6 { border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s3E08F9CA { border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC54D2024 { border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF42CB81 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s85D71A24 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3DE46EBF { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD3B88E32 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA30831E3 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s63B28A23 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:9pt }     FIRST SECTION               CASE OF MILLBANK AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM   (Application nos. 44473/14, 58659/14, 70874/14, 71699/14, 73574/14, 73638/14, 73771/14, 73783/14, 73909/14, 73911/14, 74403/14, 74409/14, 75735/14, 75846/14, 2294/15, 18149/15, 24868/15, 26031/15, 26045/15, 28688/15, 32681/15 and 32685/15)                           JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   30 June 2016       This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Millbank and Others v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Robert Spano, President,   Paul Mahoney,   Pauliine Koskelo, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 2 June 2016, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against the United Kingdom lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The applications were communicated to the United Kingdom Government (“the Government”). THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants, who are convicted prisoners, complained about their ineligibility to vote in elections. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 6.     The applicants complained about their ineligibility to vote in elections. They relied on Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, which reads as follows: “The High Contracting Parties undertake to hold free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature.” 7.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding ineligibility to vote in elections (see, for instance, Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005 ‑ IX; Greens and M.T. v.   the United Kingdom , nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, ECHR 2010 (extracts); McLean and Cole v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 12626/13 and 2522/12, 11 June 2013; and Firth and Others v. the United Kingdom , nos. 47784/09, 47806/09, 47812/09, 47818/09, 47829/09, 49001/09, 49007/09, 49018/09, 49033/09 and 49036/09, 12 August 2014). 8.     In the leading cases of Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) and Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom , both cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the statutory ban on prisoners voting in elections is, by reason of its blanket character, incompatible with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. 10.     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article   3 of Protocol No. 1. III.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 11.     Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” 12.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Firth and Others v. the United Kingdom, cited above, §§ 19-22), the Court concludes that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, 1.     Decides to join the applications;   2.     Declares the applications admissible;   3.     Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of Protocol   No. 1 concerning the ineligibility to vote in elections;   4.     Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants. Done in English, and notified in writing on 30 June 2016, pursuant to Rule   77 §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.   Hasan Bakırcı   Robert Spano Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 (ineligibility to vote in elections)   No. Application no./ Date of introduction Applicant name/ Date of birth Election Details     44473/14 21/11/2014 Joseph MILLBANK 19/07/1960 European Parliament 22 May 2014     58659/14 18/11/2014 Michael Christopher HORA 10/04/1966 European Parliament 22 May 2014     70874/14 30/10/2014 Kenneth SMITH 04/12/1963 European Parliament 22 May 2014     71699/14 06/11/2014 Kevin Alexander MATHERS 17/09/1987 European Parliament 22 May 2014     73574/14 19/11/2014 William Hugh LAUCHLAN 01/07/1976 European Parliament 22 May 2014     73638/14 18/11/2014 Steven McARTHUR 24/02/1988 European Parliament 22 May 2014     73771/14 17/11/2014 Harry CALDWELL 22/02/1974 European Parliament 22 May 2014     73783/14 17/11/2014 Shaun Thomas Robertson LESLIE 07/02/1987 European Parliament 22 May 2014     73909/14 18/11/2014 Robert David ANDERSON 07/12/1962 European Parliament 22 May 2014   73911/14 17/11/2014 & 11/05/2015 Adrian RUDDOCK 04/01/1973 European Parliament 22 May 2014, Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015   74403/14 18/11/2014 Christopher Andrew READINGS 28/09/1966 European Parliament 22 May 2014   74409/14 18/11/2014 Thomas MICHALOWSKI 24/01/1971 European Parliament 22 May 2014   75735/14 18/11/2014 John Christie Burnett WALKER 09/06/1965 European Parliament 22 May 2014   75846/14 17/11/2014 James STRATTON 18/12/1942 European Parliament 22 May 2014   2294/15 17/11/2014 Scott Francis BOWRING 16/04/1971 European Parliament 22 May 2014   18149/15 18/05/2015 Howard SIMMERSON 01/07/1962 Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015   24868/15 13/05/2015 Marcia Petra Julia WALKER 21/12/1973 Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015   26031/15 21/05/2015 Brian DICK 29/12/1969 Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015   26045/15 20/05/2015 Ian William Buchanan WILSON 11/07/1973 Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015   28688/15 28/05/2015 David Bruce PENMAN 15/01/1975 Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015   32681/15 12/06/2015 Paul SINCLAIR 19/06/1989 Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015   32685/15 18/06/2015 Guy EVANS 21/01/1969 Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015