CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 1 septembre 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5362FFEB { width:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .s7FA9F17E { width:178.75pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s4600776 { height:53.3pt } .sAC521AF { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sDCE36575 { height:31.45pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE52A5D7A { height:21.15pt } .sDB7D4500 { height:32.1pt } .sCB52C657 { height:125.75pt } .s9ECAA7E1 { height:8.2pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 25203/12 GÖDÖLLŐI PIAC KFT against Hungary and 8 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 1   September 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Egidijus Kūris,   Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 22 September 2016.   Hasan Bakırcı   Vincent A. De Gaetano Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Date of receipt of Government declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant / household (in euros) [i]     25203/12 19/04/2012   GÖDÖLLŐI PIAC KFT   Patakiné Schneider Márta Budapest 31/05/2016 18/05/2016 9,100     25208/12 16/04/2012 Judit KOCSIS 24/01/1962     20/05/2016 15/03/2016 3,000     27891/12 27/04/2012   YO-FA KFT       30/05/2016 06/06/2016 3,000     34626/12 17/05/2012 Iosif Iuliu PATAKY 20/03/1933 Litresits András Budapest 19/05/2016 06/06/2016 1,500     37005/12 06/06/2012 Miklós KOLLÁR 27/02/1972 Révész Gábor Budapest 30/05/2016 05/04/2016 3,900     38551/12 21/05/2012 (9 applicants) József HOLTSÁG 15/04/1948 Dóra Anikó KOVÁCS 03/09/1977 Bertalan GÁSPÁR 01/04/1943 Zoltánné DANHAUSER 20/02/1947 Imre HORVÁTH 26/06/1935 Vince BUSAI 28/06/1942 Éva REZNEKI 25/12/1962 Katalin REZNEKI 12/01/1967 Lászlóné BOKOR 29/08/1942 Szlávnits László Budapest 27/04/2016 29/03/2016 9,000     48492/12 24/07/2012 Bela HUTTERER   Horváth István Budapest 27/04/2016 17/02/2016 5,200     57963/12 03/09/2012 Gabriella Kinga SAS 21/03/1972     28/04/2016 27/04/2016 4,000     59087/12 09/09/2012 Rezső Gábor BICZÓ 25/07/1961 Kmetty Ildikó Vác 20/05/2016 24/05/2016 3,500   [i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.