CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 septembre 2016
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0920DEC000855113
- Date
- 20 septembre 2016
- Publication
- 20 septembre 2016
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .s9D8C29BD { width:190.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 8551/13 and 27494/14 Zoran PETKOVIĆ against Serbia and Tatjana PEROVIĆ ŽURŽIĆ and Milena ŽURŽIĆ against Serbia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 20   September 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Pere Pastor Vilanova, President,   Branko Lubarda,   Georgios A. Serghides, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on 9 January 2013 and 24 March 2014 respectively, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant in the first case (app. no. 8551/13), Mr Zoran Petković, is a Serbian national, who was born in 1950 and lives in Knjaževac. He was represented before the Court by Mr M. Petković, a lawyer practising in Bor. The applicants in the second case (app. no. 27494/14), Ms Tatjana Perović Žuržić and Ms Milena Žuržić, are both Serbian nationals, who were born in 1988 and 1990 respectively and live in Baošić, Montenegro, and Bor, Serbia. They were also represented before the Court by Mr   M.   Petković, a lawyer practising in Bor. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were initially represented by their former Agent, Ms V. Rodić, who was recently substituted by their current Agent, Ms N. Plavšić. The applicants complained, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, about the non-enforcement of civil judgments. The applicants’ complaints were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letter dated 18 May 2016, sent by registered post, the applicants’ representative was notified that the Court had not yet received their observations and claims for just satisfaction and that the Court had extended time for submissions until 1 June 2016. The applicants’ representative’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicants’ representative received this letters on 27 May 2016. However, no response has been received. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 13 October 2016.   Fatoş Aracı   Pere Pastor Vilanova Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 20 septembre 2016
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0920DEC000855113
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral