CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 septembre 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .sE6F1442 { width:204.43pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 10851/09 Vladimir Ilyich IVANOV against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 20   September 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President,   Pere Pastor Vilanova,   Georgios A. Serghides, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 17   September   2008, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Vladimir Ilyich Ivanov, is a Russian national, who was born in 1956. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. Mr Ivanov was the defendant in criminal proceedings. He was detained in the IZ-47/1 remand prison in St   Petersburg. On 17   September   2008 an application form was introduced on his behalf and signed by Ms   Maria   Zhiglaeva. No authority form was enclosed. COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article   3 of the Convention about the inhuman and degrading conditions of his detention. THE LAW The Government submitted that, in the absence of a valid authority form or the applicant’s original signature, the application was inadmissible ratione personae . The Court asked the applicant to comment on the Government’s submissions but did not receive any reply. The Court reiterates that, where the application is not lodged by the victims themselves, Rule 45   §   3 of the Rules of Court requires a written   authority   to act, duly   signed, to be produced. It is essential for representatives to demonstrate that they have received specific and explicit instructions from the alleged victim on whose behalf they purport to act before the Court (see Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no.   46043/14, §   91, ECHR 2015 (extracts), with further references). In the instant case, the application form was not signed by Mr   Ivanov who was listed as the applicant. No authority form authorising Ms   Zhiglaeva to act on his behalf has been provided. Moreover, there have been no apparent reasons to consider that Mr   Ivanov was a vulnerable person who was not able to lodge complaints to the Court himself (compare Isakov v. Russia (dec.), no.   52286/14, §   39 et seq., 5   July   2016, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania   ([GC], no.   47848/08 , ECHR 2014). Regard being had to the above, the Court concludes that Ms   Zhiglaeva did not have standing to introduce the application on behalf of Mr   Ivanov. It follows that the application is incompatible   ratione personae   with the provisions of the Convention pursuant to Article   35   §   3 (a) and must be rejected pursuant to Article   35   §   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible.   Done in English and notified in writing on 13 October 2016.   Fatoş Aracı   Branko Lubarda Deputy Registrar   President