CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 13 octobre 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5362FFEB { width:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .sC3D571B0 { width:197.1pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sE512A940 { font-family:Arial; color:#474747 } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s57395D7A { height:28.35pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 53830/11 Yılmaz YAVUZ against Turkey and 20 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 13   October 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Nebojša Vučinić, President,   Valeriu Griţco,   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 5   §   3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 3 November 2016.   Hasan Bakırcı   Nebojša Vučinić Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention ( excessive length of pre-trial detention ) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Representative name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [i] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [ii]     53830/11 13/07/2011 Yılmaz YAVUZ 04/06/1967 Kırdök Mehmet Ali Istanbul Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation for unlawful arrest or detention   01/08/2016 20/09/2016 6   000 500     74163/11 13/10/2011 Ali Deniz KILIÇ 29/12/1990 Ato Murat Istanbul   01/08/2016 01/03/2016 2,700 500     6431/12 04/10/2010 Muammer SEKMAN 07/05/1976 Kayaoğlu Nurettin Istanbul   01/08/2016 16/06/2016 6,000 500     7492/12 18/01/2012 Ahmet TEKE 01/10/1984 Kaya Abdulhakim Istanbul   01/08/2016 14/04/2016 4,000 500     8043/12 21/12/2011 Harun AKBAŞ 01/08/1990 Kızılkaya Mehmet Sani Istanbul     01/08/2016 27/01/2016 3500 500     13542/12 30/01/2012 Sezgin BİNGÖL 01/05/1988 Polat Taş Yıldız Istanbul Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - lack of remedy, Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation for unlawful arrest or detention - lack of compensation   01/08/2016 29/02/2016 4,800 500     19201/12 06/03/2012 Mehmet DALMIŞ 10/03/1951       01/08/2016 12/04/2016 3,200       24630/12 20/03/2012 Şehmus TEKİN 01/02/1951 Erbil Mehmet Istanbul   01/08/2016 05/01/2016 2,800 500     27030/12 19/03/2012 Yusuf KAPLAN 01/01/1969 Erbil Mehmet Istanbul   01/08/2016 05/01/2016 5,800 500   27069/12 23/03/2012 Hatice KALKAN 05/02/1984 Polat Taş Yıldız Istanbul Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - lack of effective remedy, Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation for unlawful arrest or detention - lack of compensation   01/08/2016 23/02/2016 3,900 500   37746/12 27/03/2012 Ergin KIPIRTI 06/01/1983 Erbil Mehmet Istanbul   01/08/2016 05/01/2016 4,900 500   54451/12 05/06/2012 Erdal ŞAHİN 01/02/1983 Boğatekin Hüseyin Istanbul Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - lack of effective remedies, Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation for unlawful arrest or detention - lack of compensation   01/08/2016 03/03/2016 5,000 500   62983/12 02/08/2012 Bayram ARSLANOĞLU 01/01/1986 Çalışcı Hüseyin Istanbul   01/08/2016 27/01/2016 2,500 500   117/13 19/09/2012 Fatih DEMİR 26/08/1989 Doğan Abidin Istanbul   01/08/2016 06/01/2016 3,800 500   320/13 21/09/2012 Bilal İMİR 01/01/1987 Acınıklı Ayşe Istanbul Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation for unlawful arrest or detention   01/08/2016 08/09/2016 2,700 500   68114/13 28/04/2005 Gülay BORAN 01/01/1977 Kırdök Mehmet Ali Istanbul   01/08/2016 05/01/2016 6,900 500   28155/15 27/03/2012 Bahattin YÜNYELİ 10/10/1982 Erbil Mehmet Istanbul   01/08/2016 05/01/2016 4,900 500   28702/15 13/10/2011 Baran NAYIR 26/02/1991 Ato Murat Istanbul   01/08/2016 09/03/2016 2,700 500   28718/15 20/03/2012 Bayram KIRICI 06/08/1962 Erbil Mehmet Istanbul   01/08/2016 05/01/2016 2,800 500   28721/15 20/03/2012 İbrahim BİÇECEK 08/04/1963 Erbil Mehmet Istanbul   01/08/2016 05/01/2016 2,800 500   62956/15 13/07/2011 Yavuz ÖZGENÇ 13/09/1975 Kırdök Mehmet Ali Istanbul Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation for unlawful arrest or detention   01/08/2016 20/09/2016 6,000 500   [i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [ii] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.