CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 22 novembre 2016
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122DEC004086906
- Date
- 22 novembre 2016
- Publication
- 22 novembre 2016
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .s9A72FAFE { width:198.43pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s62C3E828 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s8BB6D734 { margin-right:9pt; margin-left:9pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s8304C6AF { font-family:Arial; font-size:7.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA7CAEB5D { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 40869/06 Yuriy Vasilyevich MELNIKOV against Russia and 8 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 22   November 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Helena Jäderblom, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Branko Lubarda, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appendix, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights. The applicants complained under Article   6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention about the quashing by way of supervisory review of the final domestic judgments in their favour. On different dates indicated in the appendix the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay them sums indicated in the appendix to cover any pecuniary and/or non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which will be converted into Russian roubles at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. The Court’s present ruling is without prejudice to any decision it might take to restore, pursuant to Article   37 §   2 of the Convention, the present applications to the list of cases (see E.G. and Others v. Poland and 175   other Bug River applications (dec.), nos.   50425/99 and 174 others, §   29, ECHR 2008 (extracts)). For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 15 December 2016.   Fatoş Aracı   Helena Jäderblom Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Date of receipt of Government’s declaration   Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance   Amount awarded for pecuniary and/or non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]   40869/06 20/10/2006 Yuriy Vasilyevich MELNIKOV 04/08/1960 Voronezh   23/09/2016 17/08/2016   EUR 5,000   2669/07 20/10/2006 Igor Dmitriyevich GRITSAY 06/10/1958 Shakhty   23/09/2016 24/08/2016   EUR 5,000   21121/07 20/04/2007 Irina Sergeyevna SKORODUMOVA 15/11/1961 St Petersburg   23/09/2016 02/09/2016   EUR 5,000   26215/07 15/05/2007 Maksim Aleksandrovich MOLODTSEV 05/10/1978 Novosibirsk   23/09/2016 18/08/2016   EUR 1,500   38500/07 04/07/2007 Lyubov Dmitriyevna ARISTARKHOVA 15/07/1948 Obninsk   23/09/2016 05/08/2016   EUR 1,500   49785/07 27/11/2004 Anatoliy Pavlovich NOVIKOV 19/06/1952 Moscow   23/09/2016 18/08/2016   EUR 1,500   923/08 14/12/2007 Anatoliy Nikolayevich GOROVENKO 26/04/1953 Krasnoyarsk   23/09/2016 21/09/2016   EUR 5,000   23213/08 24/04/2008 Galina Ivanovna POLCHAK 16/01/1959 Novoaleksandrovsk   23/09/2016 21/09/2016   EUR 1,500   58357/08 30/05/2008 Yuriy Anatoliyevich LI 12/06/1950 St Petersburg   23/09/2016 05/08/2016   EUR 1,500     [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 22 novembre 2016
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122DEC004086906
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral