CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 5 janvier 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0105DEC000706106
- Date
- 5 janvier 2017
- Publication
- 5 janvier 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .sE6F1442 { width:204.43pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 7061/06 Eduard Vladimirovich TSELINSKIY against Russia and 25 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 5   January 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President,   Pere Pastor Vilanova,   Georgios A. Serghides, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the dates set out in the appendix, Having regard to the decision to apply the pilot-judgment procedure taken in the case of Gerasimov and Others v.   Russia (nos. 29920/05 and 10   others, §   218, 1   July 2014), Having regard to the declarations submitted by the Government and the applicants’ acceptance of their terms, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants are Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are set out in the appendix. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights. The applicants complained, among other matters, about the delayed enforcement of the judgments in their favour imposing various obligations in kind on domestic authorities and the lack of the effective remedies in respect of the non-enforcement complaint. Dates of the judgments, their entry into force and their full enforcement are set out in the appendix. In the wake of the pilot judgment, on various dates in late 2014 the applications were communicated to the Government (see Gerasimov and Others, cited above, §§   230-31, and point   13 of the operative part). On the dates specified in the appendix the Government submitted unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by the applications. In their declarations they acknowledged, in each case, the lengthy enforcement of the judgment in the applicant’s favour. The unilateral declarations further contained, in each case, the dates of the judgment at issue, its entry into force and its full enforcement, as well as an overall enforcement delay. The authorities stated their readiness to pay to the applicants the sums listed in the appendix as just satisfaction. The payments were to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable. They would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay the sums within the said period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payments would constitute the final resolution of the cases. In their letters received on the dates indicated in the appendix, the applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the Government’s declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similarity of the main issues under the Convention in the above cases, the Court decides to join the applications and examine them in a single decision. The Court attaches particular weight to the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government. It finds that such agreement shall be considered as a friendly settlement between the parties (see   Cēsnieks v.   Latvia   (dec.), no.   9278/06, §   34, 6   March 2012, and Bakal and Others v.   Turkey   (dec.), no.   8243/08, 5   June 2012). The Court therefore takes formal note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. The Court further considers that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols (Article   37   §   1 in fine of the Convention and Rule   62   §   3 of the Rules of Court). In any event the Committee of Ministers remains competent to supervise the execution of the terms of the friendly settlement as set out in the present decision (Article   39   §   4 of the Convention and Rule   43   §   3 of the Rules of Court). Further, in any event the Court’s present ruling is without prejudice to any decision it might take to restore, pursuant to Article   37   §   2 of the Convention, the present applications to its list of cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. The Court considers that the amounts proposed by the Government should be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides, having regard to the terms of the Government’s declarations, and the arrangements for ensuring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein, and the applicants’ acceptance of the terms of the declarations, to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 26 January 2017.   Fatoş Aracı   Branko Lubarda Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Representative Date of judgment Final on Enforcement date Enforcement delay as specified in the unilateral declaration Date of unilateral declaration Remedial offer (euros) Date of applicant’s letter in reply     7061/06 27/01/2006   Eduard Vladimirovich TSELINSKIY 29/01/1966 Klin     09/07/2007 27/07/2007   29/06/2011 3 years 11 months 25/07/2016   3,850 22/09/2016     11765/06 09/02/2006   Raisa Mikhaylovna VASETSKAYA 17/08/1948 Milovidovo     13/03/2002 25/03/2002   27/04/2007 5 years 1 month 01/06/2016   3,210 27/09/2016     25026/06 26/05/2006   Andrey Mikhaylovich SHASHKOV 07/11/1967 Yekaterinburg     13/12/2005 30/12/2005   11/08/2008 2 years 7 months 12 days 01/06/2016   2,560 18/08/2016     44076/07 11/09/2007   Aleksandr Borisovich TELKOV 26/09/1957 St Petersburg   Galina Nikolayevna TELKOVA 30/03/1962 St Petersburg     05/03/1999 05/04/1999 29/10/2008 9 years 6 months 24 days 26/09/2016   6,500 07/11/2016     15446/09 16/05/2008   Nina Aleksandrovna YEZHOVA 10/11/1949 Chelyabinsk     06/05/2004 24/05/2004   20/11/2007 3 years 5 months 27 days 07/07/2016   3,420 09/08/2016     22514/09 18/02/2009   Zelimkhan Abadiyevich GUTIYEV 01/01/1942 Alkhanchurt   Aleksandr Yuryevich DZILIKHOV 01/03/2005 19/04/2005   03/06/2013 8 years 1 month 15 days 07/07/2016   6,500 19/09/2016     37610/09 03/06/2009   Igor Aleksandrovich PATERIKIN 30/09/1961 Svetlyy     31/03/2008 02/07/2008       23/12/2010 2 years 5 months 21 days 07/07/2016   2,420 14/10/2016     40999/09 13/05/2009   Lyudmila Sergeyevna TYULKINA 02/06/1949 Armavir     07/07/2005 19/07/2005       24/06/2013 7 years 11 months 5 days 07/07/2016   6,500 09/08/2016     2656/10 22/12/2009   Aleksandr Mikhaylovich KADUSHKIN 04/04/1947 Sochi   Tatyana Ivanovna KADUSHKINA 31/10/1953 Sochi     10/10/2006 23/11/2006     22/10/2009 2 years 11 months 07/07/2016   2,850 (jointly) 16/08/2016   4526/10 29/12/2009   Galina Ilyinichna TEPLYAKOVA 01/01/1952 Shenkursk     24/11/2008 05/12/2008       02/12/2011 2 years 11 months 27 days 07/07/2016   2,930 11/08/2016   6269/10 30/11/2009   Sergey Vladimirovich VOROTNIKOV 07/01/1966 Pushkino     21/05/2009 02/06/2009     11/07/2013 4 years 1 month 9 days 07/07/2016   4,030 09/08/2016   19910/10 09/03/2010   Yelena Alekseyevna SERDYUKOVA 05/06/1961 Belgorod     15/05/2009 02/07/2009     20/05/2015 5 years 10 months 18 days 13/07/2016   5,760 19/09/2016   28858/10 04/05/2010   Mikhail Aleksandrovich BULATOV 04/08/1976 Moscow     13/08/2009 25/08/2009     27/12/2012 3 years 4 months 2 days 13/07/2016   3,270 03/10/2016   28859/10 04/05/2010   Nikolay Vladimirovich YAKOVLEV 15/01/1976 Moscow     13/08/2009 25/08/2009     05/09/2013 4 years 10 days 18/04/2016   3,950 13/06/2016   32272/10 30/04/2010   Aleksandr Semenovich SHEVELEV 14/01/1973 Syktyvkar   Ernest Aleksandrovich MEZAK 21/05/2008 28/06/2008       06/05/2014 5 years 10 months 8 days 13/07/2016   5,000 29/09/2016   42962/10 07/07/2010   Pavel Yakovlevich KOMARNITSKIY 08/05/1966 Rostov-na-Donu     27/08/2008 09/09/2008     26/06/2012 3 years 9 months 17 days 18/04/2016   3,720 08/06/2016   44376/10 08/06/2010   Nikolay Refatovich ABDULIN 06/04/1961 Rostov-na-Donu     17/07/2008 04/08/2008     07/03/2013 4 years 7 months 3 days 18/04/2016   4,500 02/06/2016   45597/10 18/06/2010   Yuriy Vladimirovich YAKOVLEV 12/05/1963 Krasnyy Krym     04/07/2008 15/07/2008       21/08/2012 4 years 1 month 6 days 18/04/2016   4,020 02/06/2016   48887/10 30/07/2010   Murat Khasanbiyevich KAKIYEV 23/01/1979 Argudan     10/04/2009 06/05/2009   19/06/2012 3 years 1 month 13 days 13/07/2016   3,060 08/09/2016   61885/10 30/09/2010   Valeriy Sergeyevich MAKAROV 01/07/1953 Moscow     07/02/2008 23/02/2008   17/05/2010 02/09/2010   31/05/2013     12/01/2016 7 years 10 months 17 days 13/07/2016   6,500 10/10/2016   71229/10 29/11/2010   Andrey Olegovich OSTROVERKHIY 13/01/1980 Moscow     16/10/2009 03/11/2009   30/01/2013 3 years 2 months 27 days 18/04/2016   3,180 17/05/2016   71329/10 12/11/2010   Sergey Nikolayevich AKSENOV 03/09/1962 Balashikha     14/08/2008 01/09/2008   02/11/2011 3 years 2 months 1 day 13/07/2016   3,100 03/10/2016   36858/11 31/05/2011   Oleg Vladimirovich STROGIN 16/07/1984 Cheboksary     06/10/2010 19/10/2010   23/04/2012 1 year 6 months 4 days 01/07/2016   1,480 09/08/2016   45657/11 04/06/2011   Andrey Leonidovich KOMAROV 15/04/1972 Arkhangelsk   Aleksandr Leonidovich KOMAROV 26/05/1977 Arkhangelsk   Lyudmila Dmitriyevna KOMAROVA 12/10/1941 Arkhangelsk   Igor Yuryevich TELYATYEV 14/11/2006 24/11/2006     27/12/2010 4 years 1 month 5 days 01/07/2016   4,010 (jointly) 08/08/2016   57402/11 16/08/2011   Vladimir Mikhaylovich NEMCHENKO 19/04/1966 Moscow     24/10/2007 09/11/2007   14/06/2013 5 years 7 months 10 days 01/07/2016   5,490   18/08/2016   70759/11 24/10/2011   Valentina Stepanovna DENISKO 19/03/1930 Yakutsk     21/10/1999 31/10/1999   30/10/2012 13 years 4 days 01/07/2016   6,500   18/08/2016    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 5 janvier 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0105DEC000706106
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral