CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 16 mars 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s959B95E9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s8031FF69 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:1pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5A29A8C7 { width:12.53pt; display:inline-block } .sC6271ACD { width:186.41pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s583D770E { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt 1.4pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s95937AA7 { border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt 1.02pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 54949/15 Bogdan Mihai POPA against Romania and 12 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 16   March 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Egidijus Kūris,   Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges, and Karen Reid, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article   3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention. The applicant in case no. 31443/16 also raised a complaint under Article   3 of the Convention in respect of the period of detention from 27   July 2011 to 9 April 2013. The Court has examined the application listed in the appended table and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, this complaint either does not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the application no. 31443/16 must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares inadmissible the complaint raised in application no.   31443/16 concerning the period of detention from 27 July 2011 to 9   April 2013; Decides to strike remainder of the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention as regards the other complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 6 April 2017.   Karen Reid   Vincent A. De Gaetano   Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Date of receipt of Government declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]     54949/15 29/10/2015 Bogdan Mihai POPA 16/06/1972 Florescu Cătălina Bucuresti 04/01/2017 19/12/2016 3,300     22247/16 16/05/2016 George DOROFTEI 10/04/1983 Peter Irina-Maria București 27/12/2016 05/12/2016 4,100     31328/16 28/05/2016 Costel RADU 10/09/1980 Mărgărit Ionela București 05/01/2017 09/12/2016 5,100     31332/16 28/05/2016 Daniel ILIE 22/08/1981 Mărgărit Ionela București 21/12/2016 09/12/2016 5,900     31337/16 28/05/2016 Claudiu-Sebastian PRISECARU 11/10/1978 Mărgărit Ionela București 29/11/2016 30/11/2016 8,000     31341/16 28/05/2016 Mouhannad DAHHAN 27/01/1960 Mărgărit Ionela București 27/12/2016 09/12/2016 3,500     31347/16 28/05/2016 Marian EFTIMIE 25/06/1982 Mărgărit Ionela București 16/01/2017 09/12/2016 7,800     31353/16 28/05/2016 Vasile ŞERBAN 12/12/1971 Mărgărit Ionela București 16/01/2017 09/12/2016 5,600     31356/16 28/05/2016 Rică-Constantin ZAFIU 11/08/1988 Mărgărit Ionela București 16/01/2017 09/12/2016 6,800   31359/16 28/05/2016 Radu MUNTEANU 12/05/1989 Mărgărit Ionela București 27/12/2016 09/12/2016 6,800   31363/16 28/05/2016 Sergiu Bogdan GHEORGHIŢĂ 05/01/1990 Mărgărit Ionela București   27/12/2016 09/12/2016 3,300   31443/16 28/05/2016 Dan OBREJA 25/05/1961 Mărgărit Ionela București 22/12/2016 09/12/2016 6,300   37207/16 20/07/2016 Ionuț MUNTEANU 04/12/1988 Peter Irina-Maria București 11/01/2017 20/10/2016 5,600   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.