CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 mars 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321DEC001155309
- Date
- 21 mars 2017
- Publication
- 21 mars 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s959B95E9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .s74FD211E { width:197.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s25B97BCD { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #808080; border-collapse:collapse } .sF5C9E8B1 { height:46.3pt } .sD1CDDC62 { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2490CDBC { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s8DB21C27 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s26ADB50A { border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .s2F4AF114 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6CF83D49 { margin-left:11.67pt; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s898DAE93 { border:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA0B2759 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.45pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sB71F2881 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA5B24500 { height:35.9pt } .sFD82DC6 { margin-left:16.12pt; padding-left:1.73pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .sBCA334AF { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7CB6920E { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s62945D10 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 11553/09 Radoljub RADOSAVLJEVIĆ against Serbia and 12 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 21   March 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Luis López Guerra, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Branko Lubarda, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants’ personal and other relevant details concerning each case are set out in the appended table. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were initially represented by their former Agent, Ms V. Rodić, being more recently substituted by their current Agent, Ms N. Plavšić. Relying on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the applicants complained about the non-enforcement of final court decisions rendered in their favour against different socially/State-owned companies. The final court decisions in question remain unenforced to the present day. Between 22 September 2015 and 8 January 2016 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them 2,000 euros, less any amounts which may have already been paid in that regard at the domestic level, to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable. This sum would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The parties, furthermore, agreed that within the said three-month period the Government would pay, from their own funds, the sums awarded in the domestic decisions at issue (see the appended table), less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the said decisions, plus the costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. These payments will constitute the final resolution of the cases pending before the European Court of Human Rights. THE LAW The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 13 April 2017.   Fatoş Aracı   Luis López Guerra Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix   No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant name date of birth place of residence nationality Represented by Final domestic decision details Enforcement order details   11553/09 20/02/2009 Radoljub RADOSAVLJEVIĆ 27/04/1959 Serbian     1. Commercial Court in Kragujevac I.St.1079/02 of 25 August 2003 2. Commercial Court in Kragujevac I.St.1079/02 of 11 October 2004   1. Commercial Court in Kragujevac I.St.1079/02 of 25 August 2003 2. Commercial Court in Kragujevac I.St.1079/02 of 11 October 2004     65771/12 03/10/2012 Milosav PAJOVIĆ 17/04/1949 Serbian   Nataša MIJALJEVIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 74/03 of 27 March 2003 2. P1. 349/04 of 22 September 2004 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 457/04 of 19 May 2004 2. I. 1094/06 of 20 October 2006   79059/12 07/12/2012 Vencislav VUKSANOVIĆ 06/07/1955 Serbian   Rodoljub MARINKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1.86/09 of 24 April 2009 Court of First Instance in Novi Pazar I.1237/11of 11 July 2011   79829/12 04/12/2012 Stojadinka VUKSANOVIĆ 25/06/1959 Serbian   Rodoljub MARINKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1.87/09 of 3 March 2009 Court of First Instance in Novi Pazar   I.1217/11 of 08 July 2011   70957/14 30/07/2012 Džemila ŠEĆEROVIĆ 17/09/1957 Serbian Ismet KALIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 688/04 of 9 November 2004 2. P. 348/06 of 27 February 2006 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 1507/05 of 27 December 2005 2. I. 1054/06 of 17 July 2006   6268/15 29/10/2012 Bisera AGUŠEVIĆ 16/11/1960 Serbian   Refija GARIBOVIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar   P1. 237/07 of 6 July 2007 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar   I. 1616/07 of 11 October 2007   16097/15 10/09/2012 Ramka REDŽEPOVIĆ 17/12/1967 Serbian Refija GARIBOVIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 300/06 of 24 May 2006 amended on 29 August 2006 2. P1. 131/07 of 17 April 2007 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 1090/2006 of 15 September 2006 2. I. 1230/2007 from 04 June 2007   21848/15 18/10/2012 Vinka MILOJEVIĆ-BABIĆ 24/04/1958 Serbian   Ismet KALIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 579/04 of 6 October 2005 2. P1. 301/06 of 19 April 2006 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 1923/05 of 5 January 2006 2. I. 1204/06 of 29 August 2006   21851/15 26/02/2013 Sadrija NICEVIĆ 13/12/1950 Serbian   Ismet KALIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 117/04 of 14 April 2004 2. P1. 360/05 of 13 September 2005 3. P1. 674/06 of 28 February 2007 4. P1. 338/07 of 9 July 2007 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 629/04 of 8 July 2004 2. I. 127/06 of 14 February 2006 3. I. 757/07 of 26 April 2007 4. I. 1977/07 of 10 December 2007     21852/15 26/02/2013 Ismeta NICEVIĆ-PUZO 05/03/1963 Serbian   Ismet KALIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 116/04 of 29 March 2004 2. P1. 356/05 of 5 September 2005 3. P1. 668/06 of 25 September 2006 4. P1. 116/07 of 9 July 2007   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 378/04 of 19 May 2004 2. I. 128/06 of 14 February 2006 3. I. 265/07 of 19 March 2007 4. I. 1980/07 of 10 December 2007   21853/15 08/03/2013 Miljana BELIĆ-PAVLOVIĆ 04/03/1967 Serbian   Ismet KALIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 547/06 of 27 July 2006 2. P1. 102/07 of 20 August 2007 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 119/07 of 20 February 2007 2. I. 2009/07 of 13 December 2007   21854/15 08/03/2013 Senad SPAHOVIĆ 07/07/1966 Serbian   Ismet KALIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 568/04 of 21 October 2004 2. P1. 360/06 of 30 March 2006   P1. 360/ 06 of 13 April 2006 3. P1. 1013/06 of 30 November 2006 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 1928/05 of 28 December 2005 2. I. 1356/06 of 10 October 2006 3. I. 123/07 of 21 July 2007   34805/15 05/09/2012 Slavica MIJAILOVIĆ-LAZOVIĆ 28/09/1970 Serbian Ismet KALIĆ Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 975/04 of 13 January 2005 2. P1. 542/06 of 2 April 2006 3. P1. 1038/06 of 9 July 2007 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 1304/05 of 27 December 2005 2. I. 1310/06 of 3 October 2006 3. I. 1966/07 of 10 December 2007  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 21 mars 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321DEC001155309
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral