CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG26
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 5 septembre 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905DEC003014110
- Date
- 5 septembre 2017
- Publication
- 5 septembre 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5362FFEB { width:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .s6D6DF111 { width:197.42pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s69A82CF5 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 30141/10 Kemal GÖÇMEN against Turkey and 3 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 5   September 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Julia Laffranque, President,   Paul Lemmens,   Valeriu Griţco, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. They were all represented by Ms D. Demirel, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. The applicants, public agents, complained that the disciplinary sanctions of warning or reprimand that were imposed on them for taking part in a   demonstration, had infringed their right to freedom of association. They further complained about the absence of a domestic remedy to challenge these disciplinary sanctions. They relied on Articles 6 § 1, 11 and 13 of the Convention. On 5 August 2015 and 16 August 2016 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay ex gratia to each of them 500 euros (EUR) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and a total of EUR 1,850 to cover any and all costs and expenses, which will be converted into national currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a   rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Given that the applications at hand concern the same facts and complaints and raise identical issues under the Convention, the Court decides to join them, pursuant to Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications, Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 28 September 2017.   Hasan Bakırcı   Julia Laffranque Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence   30141/10 12/05/2010 Kemal GÖÇMEN 12/02/1961 Mersin   38337/10 05/05/2010 Mehmet ALYÜZ 01/01/1954 Bursa Sadık ERAYDIN 07/04/1962 Aydın Cüneyt DAĞAŞAN 04/03/1962 Aydın Hacı Ali BOZTAŞ 10/10/1984 Aydın   41308/10 15/04/2010 İlyas ATAŞ 22/03/1962 Manisa Abdulkadir BAYDUR 01/01/1969 Manisa Süreyya UŞAKLI 03/07/1965 Manisa Ali SAVAŞ 02/03/1961 İzmir Esin UYAR 22/09/1962 Manisa Özlem ZERENER 21/05/1970 Manisa Yıldırım USLU 28/06/1965 Manisa Ayşe Armağan ERSAN 21/07/1980 Manisa Atalay DOĞAN 01/11/1956 Manisa Nuriye TUNCAR 23/02/1970 Manisa Güler METE 25/08/1970 Manisa Muharrem SİVRİLER 01/07/1956 Manisa Gülsen MUTLUAY 06/05/1964 Manisa Ayhan ESMEROĞLU 01/01/1967 İzmir Oya UZUN 07/04/1964 İzmir Nalan PEYNİRCİ 07/03/1963 Manisa Cemile Bahar SERT 15/04/1967 Manisa Selami YAMAN 01/01/1962 Manisa Fikret PEKŞEN Manisa Serhat ÖZTÜRK 25/04/1974 Manisa Mehmet TANRIOVER 06/05/1953 Manisa Selma TANRISEVEN 01/02/1959 İzmir   49021/10 20/07/2010 Ali ÇELEBİ 27/07/1963 Antalya    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 26
- Date
- 5 septembre 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905DEC003014110
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral