CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 septembre 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921DEC007773814
- Date
- 21 septembre 2017
- Publication
- 21 septembre 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s761D06F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:11pt } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s219AC2B9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:21.3pt; text-align:left } .s5F4270C1 { width:165.65pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sB62BA9AD { width:168.28pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s26725EEE { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION This version was rectified on 21 December 2017 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court. Application no. 77738/14 Gheorghe Ion CIOTĂU against Romania and 25 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 21   September 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article   3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three ‑ month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 12 October 2017. Liv Tigerstedt   Vincent A. De Gaetano Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Date of receipt of Government declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]     77738/14 16/01/2015 Gheorghe Ion Ciotău 24/03/1975     15/12/2016 12/07/2016 3,000     4062/15 10/07/2015 Levente-Attila Istvanfi [1] 07/01/1985     14/12/2016 16/11/2016 4,500     40430/15 12/11/2015 Mircea Taraş 27/03/1951     14/12/2016 19/07/2016 9,000     42832/15 16/09/2015 Gabriel Rădulescu 09/11/1983     05/12/2016 09/11/2016 4,400     43315/15 08/01/2016 Adrian Marasin-Jicmon 21/11/1976 Andreia Mihaela Marasin-Jicmon Brașov 14/12/2016 25/10/2016 3,000     51983/15 06/01/2016 Silviu-Elvis Secrieriu 27/03/1989     29/11/2016 20/10/2016 3,200     55789/15 25/03/2016 András Mátyás 14/03/1969     01/03/2017 10/01/2017 15,000     60974/15 03/06/2016 Claudiu Benea 09/02/1971     21/12/2016 07/11/2016 4,500     133/16 25/01/2016 Zoltan Stretea 05/01/1984     04/11/2016 05/04/2017 3,600       1753/16 15/03/2016 Cristian-Lucian Bulea 10/05/1983 Alexandru Mitrean Cluj-Napoca 01/03/2017 10/01/2017 3,000   2855/16 26/05/2016 Gheorghe Fîciu 31/07/1980     14/12/2016 27/10/2016 6,600   6813/16 29/02/2016 Marian Sandu 22/09/1969 Irina Maria Peter Bucharest 09/12/2016 07/11/2016 4,800   8823/16 05/02/2016 Dragoș-Ionuț Irimia 05/03/1991 Daniela Tonică Huși 24/11/2016 02/08/2016 12,300   8826/16 05/02/2016 Mihăiţă-Ionuţ Irimia 21/03/1987 Daniela Tonică Huși 24/11/2016 02/08/2016 12,300   9885/16 19/04/2016 Florentin-Cătălin Matei 23/09/1975     01/03/2017 11/01/2017 5,400   12869/16 01/03/2016 Costel Obreja 24/05/1981     14/12/2016 07/11/2016 5,600   16630/16 25/05/2016 Mihail-Virgil Poienaru 01/09/1968     14/12/2016 24/10/2016 5,700   17827/16 27/04/2016 Iulian-Adrian Pîndaru 11/07/1988     09/12/2016 10/11/2016 5,000   19675/16 09/05/2016 Teodor Fluturaș 10/06/1983     14/11/2016 07/11/2016 12,300   20012/16 04/04/2016 Aurel Mailat 25/02/1986 George Bogdan Pocovnicu Bacău 21/12/2016 12/10/2016 3,500   21877/16 21/05/2016 Nicolae-Silviu Ionescu 27/07/1986 Irina Maria Peter Bucharest 14/12/2016 30/09/2016 8,600   23744/16 22/04/2016 Vasile Hobeanu 25/09/1971     14/12/2016 24/10/2016 3,000   24190/16 16/05/2016 Marin Cobzaru 28/10/1976     01/03/2017 03/01/2017 3,900       26977/16 26/05/2016 Marius-Cătălin Ioniţă 07/05/1984 Irina Maria Peter Bucharest 21/12/2016 03/10/2016 11,700   31422/16 16/05/2016 Cristian-Bogdan Ban 25/04/1988 Vasile Rareș Biro Satu Mare 21/12/2016 04/10/2016 6,000   31426/16 17/05/2016 Nicolae-Andrei Hamzo 13/09/1988     14/12/2016 10/10/2016 7,200   [1] Rectified on 21 December 2017: the text was: “Levente Atilla Istvanfi”. [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 21 septembre 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921DEC007773814
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral