CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 26 septembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .sE6F1442 { width:204.43pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6674DD39 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s85016119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } .sCDBD1948 { width:15.71pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 11148/06 Khasan Khusenovich MATIYEV against Russia and 9 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 26   September 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President,   Pere Pastor Vilanova,   Georgios A. Serghides, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants are Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are set out in the appendix. The applicants complained about the delayed enforcement of the judgments in their favour imposing various obligations in kind on domestic authorities and the lack of the effective remedies in respect of the non ‑ enforcement complaints. Applicants’ complaints were communicated on 17 November 2016 to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who were represented initially by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and then by his successor in that office, Mr M. Galperin. In July and September 2016 the Government submitted their observations on admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their observations in reply by the dates indicated in the appendix. By the Registry’s letters sent on 24   February 2017 by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations in reply had expired on various dates (see the appendix) and that no extension of time had been requested. Their attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. On the dates specified in the appendix, the applicants received that letters. However, no replies have been received by the Registry. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court considers that, the applicants in the present cases may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 19 October 2017.   Fatoş Aracı   Branko Lubarda Deputy Registrar   President Appendix   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Deadline for observations expired on   Date of receipt of the Registry’s letter by the applicant   11148/06 03/02/2006 Khasan Khusenovich MATIYEV 01/01/1930 Troitskaya, Republic of Ingushetia   12/10/2016       23/03/2017   11150/06 12/02/2006 Roza Muratovna KATIYEVA 23/03/1947 Ordzhonikidzevskaya, Republic of Ingushetia   12/10/2016 24/03/2017   11152/06 06/02/2006 Khasan Amerkhanovich KHAMATKHANOV 28/12/1956 Troitskaya, Republic of Ingushetia   12/10/2016 23/03/2017   11154/06 12/02/2006 Movsar Sayupovich GAZIKOV 02/01/1958 Troitskaya, Republic of Ingushetia   12/10/2016 23/03/2017   11160/06 06/02/2006 Yunus Idrisovich DZAYTOV 08/10/1967 Troitskaya, Republic of Ingushetia   12/10/2016 23/03/2017   11167/06 09/02/2006 Savarbek Selmurziyevich MATIYEV 24/05/1929 Dolakovo, Republic of Ingushetia   12/10/2016 25/03/2017   11181/06 10/02/2006 Abuyazit Isayevich BEKBUZAROV 11/08/1958 Malgobek, Republic of Ingushetia   22/12/2016 22/03/2017   11198/06 12/02/2006 Makar Magomed Gireyevich AKHILGOV 18/01/1934 Malgobekskiy rayon, Republic of Ingushetia   12/10/2016 23/03/2017   47354/10 14/07/2010 Yevgeniy Nikolayevich ROGOVENKO 25/03/1949 Kaliningrad   12/10/2016 04/04/2017              49955/11 18/07/2011 Kurban Magomedovich IZUDINOV 20/08/1971 Astrakhan   22/12/2016 22/03/2017