CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 10 octobre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .s74FD211E { width:197.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s856DF1B6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10.5pt } .sE512A940 { font-family:Arial; color:#474747 } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sBF01BB12 { font-family:Arial; font-size:10.5pt; list-style-position:inside } .s91636E87 { width:0.39pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 44854/08 Tatyana Igorevna BEVZ against Russia and 4 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 10   October 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Luis López Guerra, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants are Russian nationals. They complained that their right to respect for their home had been violated. Their complaints were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who were initially represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and then by his successor in that office, Mr M. Galperin. The applicants failed to respond to the last Registry’s letter, reminding that the period allowed for submission of their observations in reply had expired and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 9 November 2017.   Fatoş Aracı   Luis López Guerra Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence   44854/08 19/08/2008 Tatyana Igorevna BEVZ 24/01/1992 Baltiysk (Kaliningrad region)   48730/11 14/07/2011 Nikolay Anatolyevich KISELEV 29/09/1956 Petergof (Leningrad region) Viktorina Petrovna Kiseleva 23/02/1961 Petergof (Leningrad region)   57824/11 15/08/2011 Leonid Sergeyevich KARPOV 25/02/1959 Votkinsk (Udmurt Republic) Ivan Leonidovich Karpov 06/06/1986 Votkinsk (Udmurt Republic) Vladimir Leonidovich Karpov 13/11/1983 Votkinsk (Udmurt Republic)   74150/11 21/11/2011 Mikhail Dmitriyevich MILASHENKO 15/02/1955 Novorossiysk (Krasnodar region) Anna Andreyevna Milashenko 06/06/1960 Novorossiysk (Krasnodar region) Nadezhda Mikhaylovna Milashenko 28/12/1985 Novorossiysk (Krasnodar region) Vera Mikhaylovna Milashenko 28/12/1985 Novorossiysk (Krasnodar region) Sofiya Yuryevna Nevilko 14/07/2010 Novorossiysk (Krasnodar region)   20832/16 05/04/2016 Igor Vladimirovich KORNYUSHKIN 06/07/1966 Ufa (Republic of Bashkortostan) Lyudmila Grigoryevna Kornyushkina 23/10/1964 Ufa (Republic of Bashkortostan) Vladimir Igorevich Kornyushkin 27/07/1997 Ufa (Republic of Bashkortostan)