CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 10 octobre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5830ECD9 { width:0.2pt; display:inline-block } .sA16F6F64 { width:174.08pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 59542/14 Ernestina ROŽMAN and Alojz ROŽMAN against Slovenia The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on   10   October 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 25 August 2014, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     The applicants, Ms Ernestina Rožman and Mr Alojz Rožman, are Slovenian nationals, who were born in 1951 and 1945 respectively and live in Artiče. They were represented before the Court by Mr D. Medved, a lawyer practising in Krško. 2.     The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Vran, State Attorney. 3.     The applicants complained under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the judicial sale of their house and the lack of effective remedies in this connection. 4.     On 26 January 2017 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicants’ complaints detailed above and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 § 3 of the Rules of Court. 5.     On 11 September 2017 the applicants’ representative informed the Court that the applicants wished to withdraw the application because of an out-of-court settlement reached by them and the Government in the domestic proceedings. THE LAW 6.     In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 2 November 2017.   Andrea Tamietti   Vincent A. De Gaetano Deputy Registrar   President