CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 19 octobre 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019DEC006078709
- Date
- 19 octobre 2017
- Publication
- 19 octobre 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s294F11C8 { width:3.2pt; display:inline-block } .sD79BB263 { width:196.1pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFBC953F6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s85016119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s477DFDB3 { margin-left:32.17pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:3.83pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no 60787/09 Akif AZIMOV against Azerbaijan and 5 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on   19   October 2017 as a committee composed of:   Nona Tsotsoria, President,   Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer,   Lәtif Hüseynov, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions were communicated to the Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”), which submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. By letters dated 28 April 2016, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired on 22 March 2016 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants were requested to inform the Court before 25 May 2016 if they wished to maintain their applications. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. However, no response has been received. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list.   For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,   Decides to join the applications;   Decides to strike the applications out of the list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 9 November 2017.     Liv Tigerstedt   Nona Tsotsoria Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant name date of birth place of residence Represented by   60787/09 24/10/2009   Akif AZIMOV 12/04/1954 Baku Gunel ABDURAHIMOVA   29504/10 13/05/2010   Maleyka AHMADOVA 15/08/1957 Baku   Turan BAHADIRBEYLI   59351/11 13/09/2011   Chingiz MAMMADOV 27/12/1956 Baku       7510/12 09/01/2012   Tahira SHAFIYEVA 01/01/1952 Baku       13442/12 15/02/2012   Sevil ALIYEVA 15/03/1954 Baku     44739/13 02/07/2013   Garanfil KAZIMOVA Baku   Sevinj ALIYEVA  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 19 octobre 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019DEC006078709
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral