CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 novembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sE7C91710 { width:195.94pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 74957/11 BOREKS - 95 against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 14   November 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Aleš Pejchal, President,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Jovan Ilievski, judges , and Renata Degener, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 1 December 2011, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant company, Boreks - 95, is a limited liability company incorporated under Macedonian law, which has its registered office in Skopje. It was represented before the Court by Mr V. Donevski, a lawyer practising in Skopje. The applicant company’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 were communicated to the Macedonian Government (“the Government”), who were represented by their Agent, Mr K. Bogdanov. The applicant company failed to respond to the Registry’s letter of 16   May 2017 (received by its representative on 5 June 2017), reminding it that the period allowed for submission of its observations in reply to the observations sent by the Government had expired on 28 November 2016 and that no extension of time had been requested. Its attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant company may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue its application, within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 7 December 2017.   Renata Degener   Aleš Pejchal Deputy Registrar   President