CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 novembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .s330D47D5 { width:214.44pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 32802/09 Oksana Yevgenyevna NENICH and others against Russia and 3 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 21   November 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Helen Keller, President,   Pere Pastor Vilanova,   Alena Poláčková, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints concerning the seizure of their passport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who were represented initially by Mr G. Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and then by his successor in that office, Mr M. Galperin. The applicants failed to respond to the last Registry’s letter (see Annex for dates and details), reminding that the period allowed for submission of their observations in reply had expired on 3 November 2016 in respect of applications nos. 2543/12 and 44202/14 and on 4 January 2017 in respect of applications nos. 32802/09 and 17137/10 and that no extension of time had been requested. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 14 December 2017.   Fatoş Aracı   Helen Keller Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Details   32802/09 05/05/2009 Oksana Yevgenyevna Nenich 21/06/1973 Kolomna   Kseniya Sergeyevna Nenich 15/01/1995 Kolomna   Timofey Sergeyevich Osin 05/06/2004 Kolomna   The last Registry’s letter of 2 June 2017 was returned by the post services as unclaimed.   17137/10 16/03/2010 Angelina Robertovna Androsyan 21/12/1984 Moscow   The last Registry’s letter of 2 June 2017 was returned by the post services as unclaimed.     2543/12 26/12/2011 Yelena Borisovna Malygina 25/07/1969 Malino Ilgam Azadovich Burnayev 02/09/1969 Malino village, Moscow Region   Represented by Ms   R. Zakatova     The last Registry’s letter of 26 January 2017 was received by the applicants’ representative on 15 February 2017. The applicants failed to respond.   44202/14 05/09/2014 Irina Nikolayevna Staretskaya 03/07/1972 Sergiyevskaya village, Krasnodar Region   The last Registry’s letter of 26 January 2017 was received by the applicant on 18 February 2017. The applicant failed to respond.