CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG26
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 novembre 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC003953410
- Date
- 21 novembre 2017
- Publication
- 21 novembre 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5362FFEB { width:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .sC3D571B0 { width:197.1pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 39534/10 Muhsin DEMİR against Turkey and 30 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 21   November 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Nebojša Vučinić, President,   Valeriu Griţco,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants, whose names appear in the appendix, are Turkish nationals and live in Kütahya. They were represented before the Court by Mr S. Kartal, a lawyer practising in Kütahya. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. The applicants’ complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants’ representative, who was invited to submit the applicants’ observations together with any claims for just satisfaction by 3 May 2017. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letter dated 11 August 2017, sent by registered post, the applicants’ representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 3 May 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ representative’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant’s representative received this letter on 21 August 2017. However, no response has been received to date. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 14 December 2017.   Hasan Bakırcı   Nebojša Vučinić Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   No. Application no. Applicant Date of birth   Represented by   39534/10 Muhsin DEMİR 07/09/1965 Süleyman KARTAL   39535/10 Hüseyin YETİM 03/07/1964 Süleyman KARTAL   39540/10 Safiye KARIP 03/11/1963 Süleyman KARTAL   39541/10 Mehmet ALTINAY 14/05/1964 Süleyman KARTAL   39545/10 Ümahan KARABAŞ 20/09/1962 Süleyman KARTAL   39548/10 Süleyman GÜRSOY 13/12/1963 Süleyman KARTAL   39551/10 Metin AYTAŞ 29/05/1964 Süleyman KARTAL   39553/10 Ali Kemal BALABAN 07/07/1966 Süleyman KARTAL   39557/10 Mustafa KARA 09/10/1962 Süleyman KARTAL             39559/10 Alaattin TOSUN 02/06/1963 Süleyman KARTAL             39561/10 Ahmet ÖZKAYA 30/12/1964 Süleyman KARTAL             39566/10 Kadir EROL 27/10/1963 Süleyman KARTAL             39567/10 Ali ÇAKIR 21/01/1963 Süleyman KARTAL             39576/10 Mehmet ARAR 20/11/1964 Süleyman KARTAL             39602/10 Hamdi AYVAZ 01/04/1963 Süleyman KARTAL             39604/10 Yusuf YÜCEL 01/02/1964 Süleyman KARTAL             39609/10 İzzet YALÇIN 01/05/1963 Süleyman KARTAL             39615/10 Erol AKPUNAR 24/07/1965 Süleyman KARTAL             39616/10 Servet KOYUN 01/11/1965 Süleyman KARTAL             39622/10 Salih Zeki AKSU 09/03/1965 Süleyman KARTAL             39626/10 Ali TUNÇ 05/03/1962 Süleyman KARTAL             39627/10 Necati ARMAĞAN 22/03/1961 Süleyman KARTAL             39629/10 Ahmet Selami YÜCEL 15/01/1963 Süleyman KARTAL             44987/10 Mehmet KARABULUT 02/01/1961 Süleyman KARTAL             44989/10 Servet İŞAL 07/11/1964 Süleyman KARTAL             44992/10 Behti TEKELİ 02/02/1959 Süleyman KARTAL             44993/10 Mehmet TAVALI 07/11/1965 Süleyman KARTAL             44995/10 Muammer KOYULMUŞ 01/04/1963 Süleyman KARTAL             44998/10 Cumhur TETİK 28/10/1965 Süleyman KARTAL             45000/10 Ali KARAAĞAÇ 01/04/1963 Süleyman KARTAL             45003/10 Halil ÇİL 01/04/1963 Süleyman KARTAL    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 26
- Date
- 21 novembre 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC003953410
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral