CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 23 novembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s660DD4FA { width:21.3pt; display:inline-block } .sCF65C0FF { width:163.98pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sB5A00429 { height:7.9pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 48484/13 Zoltán VARGYAI against Hungary and 7 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23   November 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 14 December 2017.   Liv Tigerstedt   Vincent A. De Gaetano Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Representative name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [i]     48484/13 18/07/2013 Zoltán Vargyai 16/11/1974 Nemess Livia Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 06/09/2017 02/08/2017 4,000     50448/13 29/07/2013 Erika Kovács 01/11/1965 Grád András Gusztáv Budapest       14/09/2017 20/09/2017 2,500     65848/13 10/10/2013 Miklós Gábor 01/09/1962   Litresits András Budapest       14/09/2017 19/09/2017 1,500     66365/13 15/10/2013 László Kökényesi 30/11/1963 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 15/09/2017 06/06/2017 2,000     69560/13 30/10/2013 Ágnes Eszter Nagy 20/01/1956     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 13/09/2017 27/09/2017 3,000     72079/13 14/11/2013 Jánosné Böle 04/03/1963 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings –   06/09/2017 20/09/2017 3,900     72829/13 15/11/2013   Kígyó Pharma Kft   Kóté Csaba Székesfehérvár         13/07/2017 19/09/2017 9,000     72127/13 14/11/2013 (18 applicants) Anikó Bartháné Szőke 15/08/1967 Kálmánné Blazovits 08/10/1952 Józsefné Csaba 01/09/1966 Lászóoné Endrődi 18/02/1953 Beatrix Juni 28/11/1981 Istvánné Kiss 14/01/1950 Jánosné Kuprak 05/08/1964 János Boldizáar Ladányi 20/11/1979 Imréné Marosvári 29/07/1953 Jolán Nagy 11/01/1955 Jánosné Szabó 23/03/1955 Józsefné Szabó 24/07/1965 Tibor Jozsefné Szerenka 15/01/1969 Judit Szulyó 30/05/1964 Éva Tremmel 06/03/1976 Katalin Veres 13/04/1960 Rita Veres 16/04/1981 Miklósné Újvári 22/11/1953 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 15/09/2017 20/09/2017 500   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.