CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 28 novembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s943A0290 { width:5.01pt; display:inline-block } .s37F28E47 { width:173.27pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 34989/12 Noshrevan ZOIDZE against Georgia The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 28   November 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Síofra O’Leary, President,   Nona Tsotsoria,   Lәtif Hüseynov, judges, and Anne-Marie Dougin, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 8 May 2012, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     The applicant, Mr Noshrevan Zoidze, is a Georgian national, who was born in 1962 and lives in Batumi. He was represented before the Court by Mr Sh. Jibladze, a lawyer practising in Batumi. 2.     The applicant’s complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 was communicated to the Georgian Government (“the Government”), who were represented by their Agent, Mr B. Dzamashvili, of the Ministry of Justice. 3.     The applicant failed to respond to the Registry’s last letter of 6   October 2017 (sent by registered mail and received by his representative on 13 October 2017), reminding him that the period allowed for submission of his observations in reply had expired on 24 May 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. His attention was drawn to Article   37   § 1 (a) of the Convention. THE LAW 4.     The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 21 December 2017.   Anne-Marie Dougin   Síofra O’Leary Acting Deputy Registrar   President