CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 28 novembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5830ECD9 { width:0.2pt; display:inline-block } .sAED99F12 { width:145.17pt; display:inline-block } .sDC975C9 { width:189.42pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 49392/09 Maria DIMA and Nicoleta Luci REGHIŞ against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 28   November 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, President,   Egidijus Kūris,   Iulia Motoc, judges, and Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 7 September 2009, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     The applicants, Ms Maria Dima and Ms Nicoleta Luci Reghiș, are Romanian nationals, who were born in 1954 and 1999 respectively and live in Călăraşi. 2.     The applicants’ complaints under Articles 6, 8 and 14 of the Convention as well as under Articles 1 of Protocol No. 1 and 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention concerning the alleged non-enforcement of a domestic judgment were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), who were represented by their Agent, Ms C. Brumar, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3.     The applicants failed to respond to the last Registry’s letter of 20 June 2017 (received by them on 28 June 2017), reminding them that the period allowed for submission of their observations in reply had expired on 6 June 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. Their attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. THE LAW 4.     The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their application, within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. 5.     In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 21 December 2017.   Andrea Tamietti   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque Deputy Registrar   President