CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 décembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s98AB28CD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF0F864BE { width:185.62pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 1397/15 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich SHATILOV against Russia and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 7   December 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Luis López Guerra, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article   3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention (see appended table). They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the other complaints under the Court’s well-established case-law. The applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention. The Court has examined the applications listed in the appended table and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the other complaints under the Court’s well-established case-law (see appended table); Declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible.   Done in English and notified in writing on 11   January 2018.     Liv Tigerstedt   Luis López Guerra Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]       1397/15 15/12/2014 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Shatilov 20/03/1975 Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna St Petersburg Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention   12/09/2016 08/12/2016 4,700     69209/16 10/11/2016 Vladislav Marsovich Khabirov 16/07/1988 Fedoseyev Viktor Viktorovich Moscow Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - The applicant indicates only one date – 12/05/2016,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - overcrowding of the cell and van; lack of the privacy of toilet; lack of adequate temperature     30/06/2017 08/09/2017 7,125     78046/16 12/11/2016 Pavel Sergeyevich Trofimov 29/08/1982 Semenov Maksim Vladimirovich St Petersburg Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Placement in a metal cage in the courtroom on 17 August and 13 October 2016,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - Dates of transportation are not specified. It appears that the applicant has been transported in inadequate conditions several times since 15/08/2016,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention   30/06/2017 19/09/2017 6,805     3552/17 19/12/2016 Aleksey Sergeyevich Lyulyushin 09/03/1984     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - 27/06/2016 - van, transit cell - overcrowding, lack of sufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, lack of food, no access to potable water,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention   17/07/2017 29/09/2017 9,000     5013/17 05/12/2016 Yevgeniy Svyatoslavovich Akatov 26/02/1985       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 17/07/2017 09/10/2017 6,500     8975/17 18/01/2017 Sergey Vasilyevich Badin 17/03/1982         17/07/2017 04/09/2017 2,460     9284/17 03/01/2017 Nikolay Vladimirovich Vinogradov 04/05/1985       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 17/07/2017 19/09/2017 6,875     9854/17 19/01/2017 Roman Igorevich Babchuk 07/11/1984         17/07/2017 19/09/2017 6,875     11000/17 28/12/2016 Stanislav Alekseyevich Brekhov 03/05/1982         17/07/2017 19/09/2017 9,750   12698/17 30/01/2017 Yevgeniy Vladimirovich Yulkin 29/06/1988   Konyakov Andrey Pavlovich St Petersburg   17/07/2017 15/09/2017 15,000   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.