CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 décembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s4EA85936 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:left } .sACAE8887 { width:184.76pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sB62BA9AD { width:168.28pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s5899E55E { margin-left:17.85pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 27274/06 Anna Fedorovna CHEKRYGINA against Russia and 7 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 7   December 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Luis López Guerra, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Articles   6 § 1 and   13 of the Convention and Article   1 of the Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. However, no response has been received. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 11 January 2018. Liv Tigerstedt   Luis López Guerra Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Relevant domestic decision Start date of non-enforcement period End date of non-enforcement period Length of enforcement proceedings Domestic order Date of the letter sent to the applicant by registered mail       27274/06 27/05/2006 Anna Fedorovna Chekrygina 24/05/1925     Oktyabrsky District Court of Rostov-on-Don, 23/11/2005   05/12/2005   pending More than 11 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 17   day(s)     "... recalculate and index-link pension payments ..." 03/07/2017     34716/06 22/06/2006   Zao Tatoyglaz       Commercial Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, 01/06/2004   01/06/2004   04/02/2005 8 month(s) and 4 day(s)   obligation of Tax Authorities to acknowledge the payment of taxes 10/11/2016     55051/08 06/06/2008 Yuriy Vasilyevich Goncharenko 19/02/1963     Krasnozhamensk Garrison Military Court, 19/09/2006   30/09/2006   pending More than 11 year(s) and 24 day(s)   to provide [the applicant] with housing ... 22/08/2017     5546/09 11/11/2008 Aleksandr Stanislavovich Starodetskiy 17/06/1929     Smolninskiy District court of St   Petersburg, 25/04/2002   01/10/2002   pending More than 15 year(s) and 25 day(s)   "...the Housing Committee of administration of St Petersburg to provide [the applicant] with housing in St Petersburg for a family of four in first-priority order." 20/06/2017     32134/09 19/02/2009 Pavel Sergeyevich Mankovskiy 09/12/1975     Petrozavodskiy Town Court of the Republic of Karelia, 21/07/2003   01/08/2003   pending More than 14 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 26 day(s)   "...the Administration of Petrozavodsk to provide [the applicant] with decent housing for a family of three..." 20/06/2017     5069/10 01/12/2009 Nikolay Petrovich Lomakin 18/01/1963     Oktyabrskiy District Court of Belgorod, 17/05/2006   23/07/2006   pending More than 11 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 2 day(s)   "... [the Ministry of Civil Defence] ... [to award the applicant the amount of a housing subsidy] ... " 19/06/2017     17904/11 04/02/2011 Alevtina Vladimirovna Galkina 20/07/1953 Belyayeva Natalya Aleksandrovna Astrakhan Volodarskiy District Court of the Astrakhan Region,   03/11/2016   14/11/2016   pending More than 11 month(s) and 13 day(s)   375   "[the Administration of Volodarskiy] to perform repairing of the house... to pay [the applicant] RUB 25,000 for non-pecuniary damage" 17/07/2017     57357/11 11/08/2011 Igor Nikolayevich Zinchenko 20/07/1966     Military Court of the Vladikavakaz Garrison, 26/10/2017   19/02/2002   pending More than 15 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 8 day(s)   476   "to recalculate [the applicant’s] period of military service... to pay [the applicant] RUB 31,925 13/07/2017