CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG26
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 février 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0206DEC005536409
- Date
- 6 février 2018
- Publication
- 6 février 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5362FFEB { width:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .s3E3166BC { width:200.1pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 55364/09 Fiodor NEICOVCEN and Fiodor MOSCOGLO against the Republic of Moldova The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 6   February 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Paul Lemmens, President,   Valeriu Griţco,   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Section Deputy Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 3 October 2009, Having regard to the friendly settlement agreements reached by the parties, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants, Mr Fiodor Neicovcen and Mr Fiodor Moscoglo, are Moldovan nationals, who were born in 1973 and 1983 respectively and are detained in Cahul. They were represented before the Court by Mr   A.   Beruceaşvili and Mr A. Maslov, lawyers practising in Chișinău. The Moldovan Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr O. Rotari. The applicants complained under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention about unlawful detention. On 5 January 2018 the Court received two friendly settlement agreements signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against the Republic of Moldova in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an acknowledgement by the Government of a breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and an undertaking to pay each of them 6,000 euros to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which sums will be converted into Moldovan lei at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. The amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlements are based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 1 March 2018.   Hasan Bakırcı   Paul Lemmens Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 26
- Date
- 6 février 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0206DEC005536409
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral