CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 8 mars 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sAB0FFF87 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .s501BE8A7 { width:150.66pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s6B02B696 { width:159.34pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 43611/10 S.C. ITALVETRI COMPANY S.R.L. against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 8   March 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 23 July 2010, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     The applicant, S.C. Italvetri Company S.R.L., is a company located in Bucharest. 2.     The applicant company’s complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of the Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement of a final judgment were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. 3.     By letter dated 13 December 2017, sent by registered post, the applicant company was invited to inform the Court about any developments of the proceedings at the domestic level. The applicant company’s attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. 4.     On 22 January 2018 the letter sent to the applicant company returned to the Court as unclaimed. 5.     The most recent correspondence from the applicant company is dated 7   July 2015. THE LAW 6.     In the absence of any correspondence from the applicant company since 2015 and given its failure to reply to the strike-out warning, the Court considers that the applicant company may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the application (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no   special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application. 7.     In view of the above, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 29 March 2018.   Liv Tigerstedt   Vincent A. De Gaetano   Acting Deputy Registrar   President