CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 22 mars 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sFD94178 { width:13.64pt; display:inline-block } .s7E12FC16 { width:173.31pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 29499/13 Sándorné KINCSES and others against Hungary and 5 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 22   March 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In the application no.   60761/16, a complaint based on the same facts was also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 12 April 2018.   Liv Tigerstedt   Vincent A. De Gaetano Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth / Date of registration Representative name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government declaration Date of receipt of the applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [i]     29499/13 24/04/2013 (30 applicants) Sándorné Kincses 29/03/1956 Sandorne Balogh 07/07/1950 Zoltanne Egerszegi 13/09/1958 Janosne Farkas 05/09/1955 Szilard Fekete 04/10/1967 Jozsef Balazs Ferenczi 08/06/1954 Lajosne Földeak 11/06/1955 Lajos Gadoczi 16/09/1956 Katalin Grama 22/04/1962 Lajos Gyenes 12/06/1953 Imre Horvath 16/07/1967 Sandor Jozsefne Jaszter 20/07/1961 Bela Jesztrebi 31/03/1956 Barnabasne Kabdebon 03/03/1958 Istvan Kakuk 26/05/1955 Agnes Karlovits 03/07/1953 Gezane Katona 07/09/1953 Ilona Kovacs 16/01/1956 Janos Liptak 21/02/1949 Ilona Nagyne Kovacs 10/05/1954 Bela Jenöne Ombódi 23/12/1950 Vinh Pham Quang 27/02/1959 Eva Solteszne Raduly 31/10/1953 Bertalan Szabo 04/05/1951 Miklos Szabo 17/07/1954 Katalin Szatmarine Szuetta 15/06/1953 Piroska Maria Viszoki 11/05/1967   Zoltan Zsiros 17/05/1960       Household Lorant Levai 31/12/1953 Lorantne Levai 17/09/1960   Kincses Sándorné Sajóbábony   18/09/2017 22/01/2018 3,800     76211/13 29/11/2013 Rita Kovács 08/12/1961   Hrabéczy Miklós Monor   14/02/2018 06/12/2017 5,000     613/14 20/12/2013 Bernadett Kádár 05/08/1979   Grád András Gusztáv Budapest   14/02/2018 13/12/2017 4,600     3185/14 19/12/2013 Katalin Juhász 05/09/1956   Urbánné Csató Julianna Budapest   09/02/2018 06/12/2017 8,000     37562/14 12/05/2014 Éva Gulyás 03/02/1958   Karsai Dániel András Budapest   09/01/2018 27/11/2017 4,000     60761/16 11/10/2016 Antalné Tihanyi 23/12/1952 Boros Péter Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 09/02/2018 13/02/2018 7,000   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.