CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 29 mars 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s79DE5897 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s34D46E87 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s2B06F383 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sBB355983 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s583D00FA { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt } .s76CC6FD2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD6E1DABD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .sC7BF4101 { width:166.26pt; display:inline-block } .sE6546C2D { width:159.78pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s26725EEE { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }       FOURTH SECTION         CASE OF BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 46831/14 and 15 others - see appended list )                 JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   29 March 2018           This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Boldijar and Others v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 8 March 2018, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The applications were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 3 “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” A.     Admissibility 7.     In application no. 51850/15, the Government raised a preliminary objection of non-compliance with the six-month time-limit. They observed that, from 18 November 2014 to 25 May 2015, the applicant disposed of 5.04   sq. m of personal space, arguing that this period interrupted the continuity of his situation. For this reason, the Government further argued that the applicant’s complaint concerning his detention in Giurgiu Prison from 13 October 2014 to 25 May 2015 was lodged out of time. Consequently, the Government asked the Court to examine the applicant’s complaint regarding the inadequate conditions of his detention in Giurgiu and Jilava Prisons only as of 25 May 2015. 8.     The Court notes that, even though the applicant disposed of more than 4   sq. m of personal space, other aspects of the physical conditions of detention remain relevant for the Court’s assessment of the adequacy of the applicant’s conditions of detention under Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example, Muršić v.   Croatia [GC], no.   7334/13, § 140, ECHR 2016). In the applicant’s case, such aspects included, in particular, an infestation of the cell with insects, poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food and a lack of adequate furniture. In this regard, the Court further notes that it is not convinced by the Government’s observations on the adequacy of the aforementioned aspects of the physical conditions of the applicant’s detention and finds that, overall, the conditions of the applicant’s detention in Giurgiu Prison remained inadequate. It follows that the Government’s preliminary objection must be rejected. 9.     The Court therefore finds that the applications listed in the appended table are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3   (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. B.     Merits 10.     The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić , cited above , §§   96 ‑ 101). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić , cited above, §§   122   ‑ 141, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos.   42525/07 and   60800/08, §§   149 ‑ 159, 10   January 2012). 11.     In the pilot case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos.   61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 12.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention were inadequate. 13.     These complaints therefore disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention. III.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 14.     Article   41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos.   61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. 16.     The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, 1.     Decides to join the applications;   2.     Declares the applications admissible;   3.     Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention;   4.     Holds (a)     that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)     that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 29 March 2018, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.   Liv Tigerstedt   Vincent A. De Gaetano Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     46831/14 04/08/2014 Remus Boldijar 04/05/1975 Miercurea-Ciuc Prison 13/02/2014 to 20/02/2015 1 year(s) and 8 day(s)   Codlea Prison 20/02/2015 pending More than 2 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 4   day(s)   0.87-2.04 m²     overcrowding, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents     lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, lack of toiletries 3,000     541/15 28/01/2015 Remus-Nicușor Moldovan 10/03/1988 Bistrița Prison 30/05/2014 to 05/02/2015 8 month(s) and 7   day(s)     infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 1,000     15555/15 09/05/2015 Vasile Meterez 17/10/1971   Represented by Peter   Irina Maria BUCHAREST   Ialomița County Police Arrest 26/02/2014 to 26/05/2014 3 month(s) and 1   day(s)   Poarta Albă Prison Hospital 05/05/2014 to 16/05/2014 12 day(s)   Slobozia Prison 26/05/2014 to 23/03/2015 9 month(s) and 26   day(s)       Rahova Prison 23/03/2015 to 02/07/2015 3 month(s) and 10   day(s)     Slobozia Prison 02/07/2015 to 19/05/2016 10 month(s) and 18   day(s) 3.80-7.60 m²             5.06-12.54 m²           2.1-2.32   m²               2.44-2.73   m²             1.97-2.2 m² lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, passive smoking         lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food         overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, passive smoking, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or restricted access to shower, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen   overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, passive smoking, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, mouldy or dirty cell   overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities     3,000       27174/15 02/11/2015     23681/15 07/07/2015 Romeo Gabriel Ardelean 18/10/1979 Miercurea-Ciuc Prison 26/02/2014 to 06/09/2016 2 year(s) and 6   month(s) and 12   day(s) 0.87-2.14 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, lack or inadequate furniture, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food 3,000     34879/15 13/07/2015 Igor Podhraški 06/11/1970   Represented by Cornoiu Teodorian CLUJ-NAPOCA Cluj County Police Arrest 29/12/2014 to 27/01/2015 30 day(s)     Gherla Prison 27/01/2015 to 18/09/2015 7 month(s) and 23   day(s) 3.77 m²             2.07-2.43 m² no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen   overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of food, lack of fresh air 1,000     41903/15 09/09/2015 Robert Andreas Bedners 10/01/1990 Miercurea Ciuc Prison 26/02/2015 to 30/05/2017 2 year(s) and 3   month(s) and 5   day(s) 0.87-2.14 m² overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 3,000     43383/15 15/09/2015 Ionuț Prața 28/07/1976 Colibași Prison 13/11/2014 to 08/08/2016 1 year(s) and 8   month(s) and 27   day(s) 1.88-1.96 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, inadequate temperature 3,000     46074/15 15/10/2015 Grigore Bîrzava 01/12/1985 Bucharest General Police Arrest 06/06/2013 to 04/07/2013 29 day(s)       Craiova Prison 04/07/2013 to 12/11/2014 1 year(s) and 4   month(s) and 9   day(s)     Drobeta Turnu Severin Prison 12/11/2014 to 15/12/2014 1 month(s) and 4   day(s)   Târgu-Jiu Prison 15/12/2014 to 28/07/2016 1 year(s) 7 month(s) and 14 day(s) 2.33 m²               1.21-1.7 m²               1.85 m²             1.91-1.97 m² overcrowding, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to shower   overcrowding, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, poor quality of potable water   overcrowding, lack of fresh air, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air       overcrowding, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 3,000   46887/15 19/10/2015 Grigore-Alin Gornoavă 01/12/1981   Gorj County Police Arrest 06/03/2013 to 28/08/2013 5 month(s) and 23   day(s)   Craiova Prison 29/08/2013 to 22/02/2016 2 year(s) and 5   month(s) and 25   day(s)   Târgu-Jiu Prison 22/02/2016 pending More than 1 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 5   day(s) 4 m²             1.08-1.48 m²             1.48-2.04 m² lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to toilet, inadequate temperature, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air     overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food       overcrowding, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to shower, constant electric light, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 3,000     33600/16 30/05/2016   50118/15 06/11/2015 Marius-Alexandru Durlea 11/05/1989 Teleorman County Police Arrest 23/01/2014 to 05/02/2014 14 day(s)   Giurgiu Prison 05/02/2014 to 30/06/2015 1 year(s) and 4   month(s) and 26   day(s)   Jilava Prison 30/06/2015 pending More than 2 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 27   day(s)   3 m²           3.39 m²             1.47-2.7 m² lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower           insufficient sanitary facilities, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen       overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen 3,000   51850/15 06/11/2015 Sandu Curt 24/08/1978 Represented by Peter Irina Maria BUCHAREST Giurgiu Prison 13/10/2014 to 05/10/2015 11 month(s) and 23   day(s)   Jilava Prison 05/10/2015 to 15/09/2016 11 month(s) and 11   day(s)   3.39-9.2 m²           1.13-1.98 m² poor quality of food, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents       overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, lack or inadequate furniture 3,000   52333/15 10/11/2015 Costel Păun 01/07/1974   Represented by Peter Irina Maria BUCHAREST Bucharest Police Section no. 6 Arrest 13/01/2010 to 02/03/2010 1 month(s) and 18   day(s)   Rahova Prison 01/03/2010 to 25/05/2011 1 year(s) and 2   month(s) and 25   day(s)   Giurgiu Prison 21/05/2011 to 24/01/2013 1 year(s) and 8   month(s) and 4   day(s)   Jilava Prison 26/01/2013 to 14/01/2016 2 year(s) and 11   month(s) and 20   day(s)   2.37 m²             1.95-2.44 m²             3.39-3.88 m²             1.44-1.72 m² overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water         overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, lack or inadequate furniture     lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water         overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, lack or inadequate furniture 5,000   61992/15 08/01/2016 Claudiu-Florian Isac 31/01/1982 Jilava and Ploiești prisons 29/04/2015 to 27/05/2016 1 year(s) and 29   day(s)   1.57-2.52 m² overcrowding, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities 3,000   2763/16 24/12/2015 Florin Șumăndan 16/08/1976   Represented by Șumăndan Petru VLADIMIRESCU   Arad Prison 11/06/2015 to 07/01/2016 6 month(s) and 28   day(s) 3.48-8.70 m² poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 1,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.