CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 24 mai 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0524DEC004530216
- Date
- 24 mai 2018
- Publication
- 24 mai 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sC0E715B8 { font-family:Arial; font-size:1pt; font-style:italic } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .s50B7D056 { width:182.94pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 45302/16 and 11061/17 Nikita Nikolayevich OSTAPKO against Russia and Dmitriy Vasilyevich MANYUK against Russia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 24 May 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on 27 July 2016 and 20   January 2017 respectively, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The case originated in two applications (nos. 45302/16 and 11061/17) lodged by Russian nationals Mr   Nikita Nikolayevich Ostapko, born in 1989, and Mr   Dmitriy Vasilyevich Manyuk, born in 1968. The applicants’ complaints under Article   3 of the Convention, concerning the inadequate conditions of their detention, and in application no.   45302/16 also a complaint under Article 13 concerning lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention, were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). On 9 November 2016 Mr   Ostapko, and on 10   September 2017 Mr   Manyuk, informed the Registry that they wanted to withdraw their applications before the Court. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications.   Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications and to strike them out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 June 2018.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar   President    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 24 mai 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0524DEC004530216
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral