CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG25
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 26 juin 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626DEC003140514
- Date
- 26 juin 2018
- Publication
- 26 juin 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s2D136050 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:12.5pt } .s4B4B41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s28BDCFEA { width:6.53pt; display:inline-block } .s172EF8F1 { width:208.76pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 31405/14 A.P. against Poland   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 26   June   2018 as a Committee composed of:   Aleš Pejchal, President,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Armen Harutyunyan, judges, and Abel Campos, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 16 April 2014, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr A.P., is a British national, who was born in 1963 and lives in Basingstoke. The President granted the applicant’s request for his identity not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). He was represented before the Court by Mr T. Krzyżanowski, a lawyer practising in Poznań. The applicant’s complaint of the alleged breach of his right to respect for his family life because of the dismissal of his Hague Convention application to have his child returned to him, was communicated, under Article 8 of the Convention, to the Polish Government (“the Government”), who were represented by their Agent, Ms J. Chrzanowska of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The applicant’s lawyer failed to file observations and just satisfaction claims on behalf of the applicant. He also failed to respond to the Registry’s letter of 3 May 2017 (received by him on 10 May 2017), reminding him that the period allowed for submission of his observations in reply had expired on 13 March 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. The   lawyer’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Out of caution, on 13 February 2018, a similar registered letter was sent to the applicant. The applicant was invited to inform the Court, by 28 February 2018, whether or not he was interested in pursuing the application. No reply has been received and it is unknown if the applicant has collected the letter. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 19 July 2018.   Abel Campos   Aleš Pejchal   Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 25
- Date
- 26 juin 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626DEC003140514
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral