CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 4 septembre 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC006006712
- Date
- 4 septembre 2018
- Publication
- 4 septembre 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s8B7697D0 { width:20.77pt; display:inline-block } .s4024CB39 { width:139.08pt; display:inline-block } .sF7DC134C { width:39.46pt; display:inline-block } .s44B8752F { width:177.11pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 60067/12 Rza Nuraddin Ogly KHALILOV against Russia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 4   September 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 13 September 2012, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Rza Nuraddin Ogly Khalilov, is a national of Azerbaijan, who was born in 1973 and lives in Almetyevsk. He was represented before the Court by Mr A. Menshchikov, a lawyer practising in Almetyevsk. The applicant complained under Article 8 of the Convention that the decision of 15 August 2012 by the Almetyevsk Town Court ordering his administrative removal from Russia with the subsequent five-year re ‑ entry ban had violated his right to respect for family life. On 21 January 2017 the above-mentioned complaint was communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and then by his successor in that office, Mr   M.   Galperin. On 18 May 2017 the Government submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits of the application, which were forwarded to the applicant. He was invited to submit his observations in reply by 17   July 2017. The applicant failed to respond to the last Registry’s letter of 31 August 2017 (received by him on 20 September 2017), reminding him that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired and that no extension of time had been requested. His attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. No reply was received to the Registry’s correspondence. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 27 September 2018.   Stephen Phillips   Alena Poláčková   Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 4 septembre 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC006006712
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral