CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 13 septembre 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC000424715
- Date
- 13 septembre 2018
- Publication
- 13 septembre 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 4247/15 KALMÁR 88 FAISKOLAI KFT against Hungary and 8 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 13   September   2018 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them, the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 4 October 2018.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth / Date of registration Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     4247/15 15/01/2015 Kalmár 88 Faiskolai Kft 15/11/2004 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 04/07/2018 08/03/2018 3,000     9439/15 06/02/2015 Csaba Szilvási 09/09/1959 Habis Kinga Budapest   05/06/2018 05/07/2018 4,000     9844/15 10/03/2015 György Veizer 01/09/1943       18/07/2018 23/05/2018 10,000     14936/15 19/03/2015 Tibor Takács 04/01/1953 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - Lack of effective remedy against the protraction of the proceedings 18/07/2018 17/04/2018 3,000     3976/16 30/12/2015 Erzsébet Szebeni 20/07/1953 Barna Ágota Budapest   12/07/2018 06/07/2018 2,500     3983/16 29/12/2015 Wallenstein Ingatlanhasznosító Kft 27/09/1999   Barna Ágota Budapest   01/08/2018 06/07/2018 4,000     5177/16 13/01/2016 Erzsébet Katalin Domokos 11/08/1954       04/07/2018 14/06/2018 10,000     76340/17 11/09/2013 (24 applicants) Levente Albert 29/07/1972 Istvan Sandor BAROCS 30/08/1949 János RIGO 01/09/1973 Jozsef FOLDESI 01/04/1948 Tibor BADER 19/03/1948 Janos BERKECZI 23/04/1953 Jozsef BAJUSZ 27/05/1956 Gyozo KAROLY 09/05/1953 Miklos TEJFEL 28/02/1976 Tibor KUNICZ 21/11/1977 Csaba SZANTO 20/05/1970 Richard MIKO 16/12/1977 Gabor VEREBELYI 05/09/1951 Kalman ZSOMBOR 05/02/1950 Jozsef BOZSER 30/09/1966 Jozsef Attila VEREB 16/10/1954 Imre VARGA 05/12/1965 József HAMAR 13/01/1971 Robert BALINT 21/05/1974 Laszlo HAJOS 19/04/1947 Janos KOZEL 07/01/1954 Krisztian PORTIK 22/07/1975 Ferenc ZUBALY 16/01/1963 Attila ANDRASI 16/12/1954 Barbalics István Budapest   09/07/2018 11/04/2018 10,700     76345/17 11/09/2013 (28 applicants) Sándor Bárány 19/10/1945 Arpad Barta 21/03/1964 Janos Bereczki 26/05/1945 Gabor Bertalan 14/04/1977 Istvan Bolla 11/01/1950 Bela Cene 31/08/1962 Imre Cene 17/12/1971 Csaba Fejes 26/03/1974 Andras Gazi 21/04/1946 Rudolf Gyomrei 11/09/1948 Janos Gyurcsics 08/11/1948 Bela Holinszki 14/04/1953 Janos Horvath 03/12/1975 Janos Hunics 26/06/1956 Ferenc Jakab 25/03/1957 Istvan Kovacs 31/01/1960 Laszlo Lukacs 12/03/1961 Laszlo Mezei 06/01/1960 Ferenc Molnár 02/12/1950 Krisztian Nadpor 24/09/1978 Bela Schmidt 08/01/1963 Lajos Sebestyen 08/02/1974 Attila Springenszeisz 13/02/1962 Istvan Trombitas 20/07/1943 István Varga Tamas Zsombor 22/05/1973   Household Adrienn Springenszeisz 16/01/1987 Nikolett Springenszeisz 06/06/1990   Barbalics István Budapest   09/07/2018 11/04/2018 10,700   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 13 septembre 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC000424715
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral