CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 septembre 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s3225EC85 { width:33.12pt; display:inline-block } .s56EAFD9F { width:153.43pt; display:inline-block } .sAFF36EC2 { width:18.78pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 52152/08 Andzhey Borisovich SAPEGIN against Russia and 3 other applications (see list appended)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 25   September 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President,   Pere Pastor Vilanova,   Georgios A. Serghides, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints concerning unlawful searches were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and then by his successor in that office, Mr M. Galperin. The applicants failed to respond to the last Registry’s letters reminding them that the period allowed for submission of their observations in reply had expired on 2 May and 7 September 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. - In application no. 52152/08 the last Registry’s letter of 1 September 2017 was received back as an “unclaimed item”; - In application no. 55692/12, the applicants received on 21 September 2017 the last Registry’s letter of 1 September 2017 and failed to respond; - In application no. 27001/15, the applicant received on 8 November 2017 the last Registry’s letter of 23 October 2017 and failed to respond; - In application no. 14410/16 the applicants received on 6 November 2017 the last Registry’s letter of 23 October 2017 and failed to respond. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 October 2018.   Fatoş Aracı   Branko Lubarda   Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Nationality   52152/08 23/05/2008 Andzhey Borisovich SAPEGIN 20/08/1974 St Petersburg Russian     55692/12 07/08/2012 Aleksandr Ivanovich SIRINOV 19/03/1959 St Perersburg Russian   Olga Vladimirovna SIRINOVA 24/01/1975 St Petersburg Russian     27001/15 21/05/2015 Oleg Gennadyevich DERYABIN 09/07/1971 Chelyabinsk Russian     14410/16 05/08/2013 Vladimir Vladimirovich VOVCHENKO 23/12/1979 Volgograd Russian   Natalya Vladimirovna IPATOVA 27/05/1973 Volgograd Russian