CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 11 octobre 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .s8DB21C27 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 18203/14 Szilárd RAJKAI against Hungary and 7 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 11   October 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). Some of the applicants also raised a complaint under Article 13 of the Convention concerning the lack of effective remedy in domestic law in respect of their poor conditions of detention. THE LAW A.     Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. B.     Complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention In the present applications, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that for the reasons stated below, these complaints are inadmissible. In particular, the Court notes that the newly introduced domestic remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention in Hungary was held to be an effective one in the case of Domján v. Hungary ((dec.), no. 5433/17, 14   November 2017). This remedy was available to the applicants and, indeed, used by them. Thus, the Court notes that the applicants’ grievances were examined by the domestic authorities on two levels of jurisdiction according to the procedure described in the Domján decision (cited above). Those authorities took into account the duration of the time spent in, and the inconveniences sustained in relation to, the inadequate conditions of detention and awarded compensation accordingly. The applicants are nevertheless dissatisfied with the awards. The Court observes that the amounts were calculated by the domestic authorities in accordance with the compensation scheme contemplated in the Domján decision (cited above). The Court is therefore satisfied that the applicants have been afforded adequate redress and can no longer claim to be victims of a violation of their rights under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention. It follows that the applications are incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 8 November 2018.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Representative Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Domestic award (in euros) Other complaints under well-established case-law     18203/14 24/02/2014 Szilárd Rajkai 02/01/1980 Fahidi Gergely Budapest Budapest Correctional Facility, Block III. ("Maglódi/Venyige") 19/04/2011 to 15/10/2012 1 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 27 day(s)   Budapest Prison 15/10/2012 to19/05/2014 1 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 5 day(s)   Márianosztra Prison 19/05/2014 pending More than 4 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 30 day(s) 3.75 m²         2.6 m²         2.4 m²     toilet not separated from the rest of the cell       toilet not separated from the rest of the cell, infestation of the cell with insects   6,400 Article 13 –lack of an effective domestic remedy     42558/14 29/04/2014 András Balogh 11/04/1971 Patócs Ilona Tapolca Pálhalma Prison, Sándorháza Block 21/03/2012 to 07/10/2014 2 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 17 day(s) 2.8 m²       5 euros/day       45763/14 17/06/2014 Victor Gabor 20/06/1987 Fahidi Gergely Budapest Budapest Prison 13/08/2013 to 16/10/2014 1 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 4 day(s) 2,6 m²   no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs   8,500 Article 13 –lack of an effective domestic remedy     49247/14 03/07/2014 Elemér Rostás 23/12/1982 Fahidi Gergely Budapest Budapest Prison, Block "A" 11/04/2011 to 06/10/2014 3 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 26 day(s)   Budapest Prison, Block "B" 06/10/2014 pending More than 3 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 12 day(s) 2,6 m²         2,5 m²   no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs, only cold water in cell   shower only once a week, cockroaches, bedbugs   13,300 Article 13 –lack of an effective domestic remedy     59015/14 21/08/2014 Róbert László Jakubinyi 28/05/1953 Fahidi Gergely Budapest Budapest Prison, Block "A" 01/07/2013 to 20/06/2014 11 month(s) and 20 day(s) 2,6 m²   no proper separation of toilet, shower only once a week, cockroaches, bedbugs, only cold water in cell   1,800       59989/14 25/08/2014 Heinz Dietmar Georg Busch 17/06/1983 Szabo Kalman Győr Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 20/07/2007 to 25/03/2008 8 month(s) and 6 day(s)   Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 31/03/2008 to 04/02/2009 10 month(s) and 5 day(s)   Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 17/02/2009 to 12/03/2009 24 day(s)   Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 19/03/2009 to 25/05/2009 2 month(s) and 7 day(s)   Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 31/08/2009 to 05/10/2009 1 month(s) and 6 day(s)   Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 04/01/2010 to 04/06/2010 5 month(s) and 1 day(s)   Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 02/07/2010 to 10/09/2010 2 month(s) and 9 day(s)   Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison and Sopronkőhida Prison 13/09/2010 to 28/04/2011 7 month(s) and 16 day(s)   Sopronkőhida Prison and Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 19/08/2011 to 05/09/2011 18 day(s)   Sopronkőhida Prison and Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 26/08/2012 to 08/10/2012 1 month(s) and 13 day(s)     Sopronkőhida Prison and Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 06/02/2014 to 24/02/2014 19 day(s)   Győr-Moson-Sopron County Prison 14/07/2014 to 28/07/2014 15 day(s) 2 m²       2.5 m²       2.6 m²       2.3 m²       2 m²       2.6 m²       2.9 m²       2.3 m²         2 m²         2.6 m²           2.6 m²         2.6 m²   only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs   only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs   only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs   only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs   only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs   only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs   only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs   only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs     only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs     only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs       only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs     only cold water in cell, no proper separation of toilet, cockroaches, bedbugs 7,000       14937/15 19/03/2015 Andrea Vizi 07/09/1972 Kalló Péter Budapest Bács-Kiskun County Prison and Kalocsa Prison 30/03/2011 to 27/03/2015 3 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 28 day(s) 2.2 m²     toilet not separated from the rest of the cell   2,200       20025/15 06/03/2015 Tamás Fulai 26/04/1993   Cech András Budapest Szeged Prison 06/12/2012 to 10/01/2013 1 month(s) and 5 day(s)   Juvenile Correctional Facility, Kecskemét 04/02/2013 to 12/03/2013 1 month(s) and 9 day(s)   Juvenile Correctional Facility, Tököl and Szeged Prison 22/04/2013 to 18/11/2013 6 month(s) and 28 day(s)   Juvenile Correctional Facility, Tököl and Szeged Prison 26/11/2013 to 19/09/2014 9 month(s) and 25 day(s)   Budapest Prison, Block "B" 22/09/2014 to 13/10/2014 22 day(s)   Szeged Prison 15/10/2014 pending More than 3 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 3 day(s) 2.4 m²       2.5 m²         3.1 m²         2.5 m²         2.5 m²         2.5 m²   infestation of the cell with insects     infestation of the cell with insects       toilet not separated from the rest of the cell, infestation of the cell with insects   only cold water in cell         toilet not separated from the rest of the cell, only cold water in cell 3,700 Article 13 –lack of an effective domestic remedy