CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 octobre 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1025DEC005910313
- Date
- 25 octobre 2018
- Publication
- 25 octobre 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s6AC7325C { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff4040 } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 59103/13 Róbert KARSAI and others against Hungary and 11 other applications (see appended table) This version was rectified on 13/12/2018 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court     The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25   October 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 15 November 2018.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth / Date of Registration   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of the Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     59103/13 11/09/2013 (28 applicants) Róbert Karsai 27/11/1972 János Ádám 23/03/1973 Emil Bánhalmi 07/11/1944 András Bodnár 11/01/1953 Zoltán Csikós 25/11/1970 György Czeilinger 21/09/1965 Gábor Devecsai 05/10/1974 Szilárd Hamar 25/11/1976 Ferenc Hassza 28/11/1966 Barna Katona 17/01/1955 Zoltán Kőszegi 29/06/1967 János Kovács 01/07/1943 István Krémer 13/06/1961 Ottó Páni 22/05/1948 István Paulik 11/08/1947 Miklos Pocsi 12/06/1959 Ferenc Portik 28/08/1955 Gabor Radvanyi 16/01/1957 Ferenc Rafai 11/12/1974 Gyula Schmidt 03/04/1977 Gabor Sefcsik 26/01/1970 Jozsef Szeidl 16/03/1949 Janos Szigli 07/05/1976 Tibor Varga 02/05/1957 Jozsef Vegh 04/05/1972 Otto Zaj 15/10/1953   Household Ilona Gyurcsek 27/08/1972 Andrea Szilvasine Gyurcsek 22/09/1975 Barbalics István Budapest   13/09/2018 11/04/2018 10,700     42573/14 26/05/2014 Rezső Sesztakov 16/07/1959 Ábrahám István Ajka   13/09/2018 03/04/2018 2,000     52990/14 22/07/2014 László Sebestyén 24/07/1963     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 16/08/2018 05/09/2018 2,500     72201/14 31/10/2014 Csaba Károly Tichy-Rács 09/03/1944       07/09/2018 09/03/2018 2,500     11927/15 02/03/2015 András Lendvay 24/07/1960 Magyar György Budapest   04/09/2018 14/09/2018 7,000     15756/15 24/03/2015 Zsuzsanna Pelyhe 22/04/1966       05/09/2018 16/05/2018 10,000     16466/15 24/03/2015 Erzsébet Benczúr 24/03/1959 Tamás Ildikó Nyíregyháza   07/09/2018 17/08/2018 2,600     47943/15 21/09/2015 Királyváros Bt. 02/02/2001 Csonka Balázs Csopak   13/09/2018 12/04/2018 3,000     53271/15 20/10/2015 Anikó Kellerné Galgócz-Deák 09/12/1964       14/09/2018 24/08/2018 3,500   53438/15 21/10/2015 Sándor Lakatos 28/04/1960 Váczi Péter Győr   13/09/2018 06/08/2018 2,000   53448/15 21/10/2015 Erzsébet Kerekes 09/08/1942 Bayerné Siklós Éva Budapest   13/09/2018 07/05/2018 13,000   53803/15 27/10/2015 Márta Szabadosné Náfrádi 20/09/1965       13/09/2018 06/06/2018 2,000   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 25 octobre 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1025DEC005910313
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral