CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 29 novembre 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 36125/15 Miklós DOMANICZKY against Hungary and 8 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 29   November 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 20 December 2018.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth / Date of registration Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     36125/15 04/08/2015 Miklós Domaniczky 20/02/1954     03/10/2018 12/06/2018 12,000     40497/15 06/08/2015 (33 applicants) Household György Péter Babay 21/02/1952 György Péterné Babay 01/03/1953   Ilona Bognár 01/09/1930   Éva Botykainé Koszorús 07/04/1967   Péterné Budizsa 23/01/1943   Anikó Cserháti 13/03/1968   Lajos Davidovics 06/06/1932   Éva Garamvölgyi 25/02/1970   Kinga Jakobovits 07/03/1955   Emma Káposztásné Szabó 26/10/1958   Ilona Kling 16/10/1943   Györgyi Kökény 20/12/1964   Istvánné Kovácsik 01/10/1942   Edit Kuruczné Sashegyi 27/10/1946   Elisabeta Sachs 09/12/1943   Ferenc Samu 16/02/1964   Mária Julianna Sárközi 11/07/1945   László Sashegyi 20/04/1950   Tamás Szilák 17/07/1963   József Szirt 17/07/1945   Andrea Tasi 23/12/1970   Edit Zágori 22/09/1951   Tiborné Zsiga 12/09/1958   Household Lajosné Davidovics 06/09/1933 Bernadett Zsófia Dubovszky 10/01/1975   Household Andras Kelemen 06/01/1943 Andrásné Kelemen 11/07/1944   Household Ferenc Mátrai 26/01/1943 Márta Margit Mátrainé Ecsédi 26/01/1943   Household József Veroszta 16/06/1949 Józsefné Veroszta 08/10/1950   Household Robert Friedenthal 10/05/1949 Róbertné Friedenthal 05/06/1951 Fülöp Sándor Budapest 27/09/2018 22/06/2018 6,800     42518/15 19/08/2015 Gabriella Anna Éles 31/01/1957 Attila Levente Petrovics 13/12/1982 Mihalics Krisztián Budapest 18/09/2018 26/04/2018 4,000     44721/15 26/08/2015   Io Számítástechnikai, Szolgáltató És Kereskedelmi Kft 08/06/1998 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest 10/10/2018 12/06/2018 7,000     49120/15 02/10/2015 László Gorove 12/04/1957     19/09/2018 14/06/2018 3,000     53267/15 15/10/2015 Éva Semjéni 09/04/1965 Cech András Budapest 10/10/2018 05/09/2018 3,000     61113/15 20/11/2015 Violetta Eszter Fodor 09/10/1972     01/10/2018 25/07/2018 3,500     4589/16 29/12/2015 Zoltán Bakos 31/08/1946     24/09/2018 13/07/2018 10,000     13394/16 31/03/2016 Ferenc Iby 03/08/1957     10/10/2018 11/05/2018 3,000   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.