CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 31 janvier 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .s556D3942 { width:152.1pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 14476/18 Dmytro Mykhaylovych TETELBAUM against Ukraine   The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 31   January 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Síofra O’Leary, President,   Mārtiņš Mits,   Lado Chanturia, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 13 February 2017, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table. The applicant was represented by Mr A.A. Kristenko, a lawyer practising in the city of Kharkiv, Ukraine. The applicant’s complaints under Articles   6 § 1 and   13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”). THE LAW The Court, having examined all the materials submitted to it and having regard to the criteria established in its case-law on the subject (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v.   France [GC], no.   30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII), considers that the applicant’s complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and   13 of the Convention, concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law, are inadmissible on the ground that the length of the proceedings, roughly five years and eight months, was not excessive or unreasonable since the case was considered by three levels of jurisdiction during this time (see, Yuryeva and Yuryev v.   Ukraine , no. 3431/03, § 43, 31 July 2012). In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 February 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Síofra O’Leary   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and   13 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 14476/18 13/02/2017 Dmytro Mykhaylovych Tetelbaum 28/11/1959 23/07/2012     11/02/2013     12/05/2014   17/10/2012     10/04/2014     15/08/2018   2 months and 25 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   1 year and 2 months 3 levels of jurisdiction   4 years, 3 months and 4 days 3 levels of jurisdiction