CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 31 janvier 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sDD97AF0 { width:154.44pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s2334154C { width:10.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s1A722788 { width:31.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sA4931FD0 { width:13.78%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF43C5150 { width:22.88%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s3BEF28FC { width:20.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s143460DA { width:10.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s56F01CFF { width:31.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5BBA12B5 { width:13.78%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s77626D63 { width:22.88%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD8FB2437 { width:20.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 50560/11 Leyla PADIR and Others against Turkey   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 31   January 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Valeriu Griţco, President,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro,   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 15 April 2011, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. They were mainly represented before the Court by Mr Abdullah Fındık and Mr Hüsnü Kaplan, lawyers practising in Sirnak. The application, which concerns the disappearance of the applicants’ relative in 1994, was communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) on 12 September 2016. The Government’s observations of 13 March 2017 were forwarded to the applicants on 22 March 2017. By letters dated 25 August 2017, sent by registered post to both lawyers, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations in reply to those of the Government and their just satisfaction claims had expired on 3   May 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. According to the postal records, both letters were delivered on 11   September 2018. However, no response has been received. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the application (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 February 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Valeriu Griţco   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX     List of applicants       No. Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence 1. Leyla PADIR 1955 Turkish ŞIRNAK 2. Abdullah PADIR 1984 Turkish ŞIRNAK 3. Ahmet PADIR 1989 Turkish ŞIRNAK 4. Ali PADIR 1991 Turkish ŞIRNAK 5. Azime PADIR 1993 Turkish ŞIRNAK 6. Emine PADIR 1995 Turkish ŞIRNAK 7. Hanım PADIR 1994 Turkish ŞIRNAK 8. Harun PADIR 1977 Turkish ŞIRNAK 9. Hazal PADIR 1985 Turkish ŞIRNAK 10. İsa PADIR 1982 Turkish ŞIRNAK 11. Mehmet PADIR 1987 Turkish ŞIRNAK 12. Musa PADIR 1979 Turkish ŞIRNAK