CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 31 janvier 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s98AB28CD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 58316/17 Igor Anatolyevich SOLOVYEV against Russia and 10 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 31   January 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 February 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     58316/17 24/07/2017 Igor Anatolyevich Solovyev 16/08/1971     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 11/06/2018 24/07/2018 1,000     67104/17 30/10/2017 Boris Anatolyevich Normayev 18/10/1983       11/06/2018 30/07/2018 2,095     68571/17 24/10/2017 Aleksandr Nikolayevich Pikalev 13/05/1970       11/06/2018 25/07/2018 3,920     71781/17 13/09/2017 Radik Failyevich Alimbekov 17/08/1979       11/06/2018 20/07/2018 1,000     75724/17 14/10/2017 Vitaliy Valeryevich Kostyuchenko 06/09/1989 Golub Olga Viktorovna Suzemka Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - Transport to the Babushkinskiy District Court of Moscow (on 24/01/2017, 21/04/2017) and to the Moscow City Court (on 18/05/2017 and 19/05/2017) by prison vans; detention in convoy cells in IZ-77/4 and in the above mentioned courts. Conditions in the van and in the cells: overcrowding, handcuffing during the transportation, lack of natural light, inadequate temperatures, lack of food, restricted access to toilet 25/05/2018 20/07/2018 3,825     76890/17 20/10/2017 Maksim Andreyevich Korneyev 05/04/1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 15/05/2018 23/07/2018 1,365     77524/17 20/10/2017 Pavel Vladimirovich Akatov 30/05/1991 Egle Denis Sergeyevich Krasnoyarsk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by rail, from SIZO-1 Ulan-Ude to a correctional colony between 29/04/2017 and 01/05/2017 25/05/2018 16/07/2018 6,500     77815/17 13/10/2017 Aleksey Nikolayevich Popov 17/09/1986     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 25/05/2018 13/07/2018 7,750     77912/17 16/10/2017 Sergey Aleksandrovich Cherkez 30/10/1976     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 11/06/2018 23/07/2018 5,500   77939/17 11/10/2017 Sergey Nadarovich Kulakov 14/03/1990 Egle Denis Sergeyevich Krasnoyarsk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - ,   Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Placement of the applicant in a metal cage during hearings in the Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk 25/05/2018 16/07/2018 7,800   81108/17 21/11/2017 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich Borisenok 17/08/1986       15/05/2018 29/06/2018 2,825   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.