CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 février 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 400/15 Kálmánné FÁBIÁNFY against Hungary and 10 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 14   February 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 7 March 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth / Date of registration Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     400/15 19/12/2014 Kálmánné Fábiánfy 16/08/1963 Pivarnyikné Juhász Emőke Budapest   18/12/2018 18/07/2018 4,000     27638/15 28/05/2015 (3 applicants) Andrásné Fucskó 30/11/1950   Household Károly Kaszanits 04/02/1947 Károlyná Kaszanits 12/11/1952   Czirmes György Budapest   30/11/2018 27/06/2018 6,000     12158/16 19/02/2016 Györgyi Fehérváriné Pataki 06/10/1953 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings.     21/12/2018 13/06/2018 3,900     45311/16 27/07/2016 (4 applicants) Household László Imre Felleg 06/11/1939 László Imréné Felleg 06/05/1946   Household György Dénes Goike 03/03/1948 Marianna Goikéné Szabó 01/04/1954 Szegedi Zsolt Nyíregyháza   02/01/2019 03/07/2018 12,000     67987/16 07/11/2016 Mariann Aranka Balogh 16/11/1971       02/01/2019 13/09/2018 800     75274/16 05/12/2016 Zsuzsanna Csapóné Mitru 12/04/1958 Hankó Faragó Miklós Szombathely   18/12/2018 21/08/2018 3,300     8962/17 21/01/2017 István Józsefné Ács 03/07/1953 Béres Norbert Budapest   19/12/2018 29/10/2018 4,000     29784/17 06/04/2017 László Aros 14/08/1959 Sebők Dóra Budapest   20/12/2018 19/10/2018 4,000     69491/17 12/09/2017 (24 applicants) Ferencné Boros 18/03/1941 János Kozma 17/11/1974 János Tóth 15/07/1969 József Udvai 20/09/1949     Household József Török 19/03/1946 Józsefné Török 07/04/1954   Household Sándor Dóczi 08/08/1955 Sándorné Dóczi 31/10/1959   Household Beáta Gál 13/09/1991 Sándorné Gál 21/08/1970     Household Pál Meló 20/06/1956 Zsolt Pál Meló 16/10/1982   Household János Kozma 15/02/1954 Jánosné Kozma 11/11/1955       Household Pál Varga 02/07/1961 Mária Vargáné Orovecz 19/10/1965   Household Lajos Nagy 03/08/1958 Márta Nagyné Kunos 17/06/1958   Household Edit Koósné Szabó 19/08/1955 Edit Piternyák 29/02/1988   Household István Berkes 27/06/1947 Istvánné Berkes 14/07/1953   Household Ferenc Csányi 30/03/1960 Ferencné Csányi 06/03/1963       Kecskés Ákos Zoltán Hódmezővásárhely   18/12/2018 24/10/2018 1,100   73667/17 03/10/2017 András Elmont 17/04/1977 Baráth Lívia Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 21/11/2018 19/12/2018 4,000   23356/18 10/05/2018 Arcadia K Kft 28/10/2003 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 03/01/2019 06/08/2018 3,300   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.