CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 février 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0214DEC001013317
- Date
- 14 février 2019
- Publication
- 14 février 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sDF08C595 { height:187.75pt } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sE664BE9E { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 10133/17 Veronika GOMBOCZNÉ VIGYÁZÓ against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 14   February 2019as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 7 March 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     10133/17 25/01/2017 Veronika Gomboczné Vigyázó 03/09/1950 Bors László Budapest   17/12/2018 25/09/2018 11,000     31565/17 13/04/2017 Gábor Csapó 15/09/1961 Deteky Gábor Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 10/12/2018 14/09/2018 8,000     44858/17 09/06/2017 Ferenc Enyedi 08/12/1954       07/12/2018 24/10/2018 2,600     45593/17 09/06/2017 Ferencné Dömötör 15/03/1951 Nagy Rajmund Budapest   05/12/2018 30/07/2018 2,500     46547/17 23/05/2017 Katalin Jébert 02/09/1965 Szegedi Zsolt Nyíregyháza   13/12/2018 06/08/2018 5,000     69494/17 12/09/2017 (23 applicants) András Fekete 28/03/1978 Zoltánné Horváth 29/12/1961 Erzsébet Joczóné Vikor 16/03/1959 Olga Kincses 28/03/1973 Judit Lojné Csanády 09/11/1969   Household Attila Szatmári 02/06/1966 Mariann Szatmáriné Kódor 24/12/1973   Household Renáta Bókáné Hürkecz 19/12/1976 Józsefné Hürkecz 03/05/1953   Household Imre Máté 18/03/1935 Józsefné Máté 12/09/1936   Household Illés Szabó 13/12/1966 Illésné Szabó 04/10/1972   Household Gyuláné Szabó 11/09/1954 Szilvia Szabó 15/12/1979 Tünde Szabó 08/07/1974 Zoltán Szabó 16/01/1991   Household Balázs Szemerédi 08/07/1996 Lili Szemerédi 20/08/2000 Szabolcs Szemerédi 11/07/1991 Ibolya Szemerédiné Borsos 17/10/1967   Household István Imre Szabó 04/11/1956 Etelka Szabóné Berkes 17/08/1963 Kecskés Ákos Zoltán Hódmezővásárhely   28/11/2018 24/10/2018 1,100     70462/17 17/09/2017 Eva Snejana Kovatch 10/10/1958 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 27/11/2018 02/11/2018 3,000     70881/17 20/09/2017 Dávid Fodor 15/08/1990       27/11/2018 03/10/2018 2,000     74642/17 09/10/2017 János Gábor Boda 06/05/1974 Bertók Varga Gábor Budapest   27/11/2018 18/09/2018 2,000   78770/17 08/11/2017 Edit Lukácsi 06/08/1974 Mozsolits Beáta Budapest   20/12/2018 19/10/2018 1,500   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 14 février 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0214DEC001013317
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral