CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 février 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4BECC9B7 { margin-top:42pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s8EA4AB47 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sAC521AF { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF3108B01 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s6D6AC3C6 { margin-top:4pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sFBA46575 { height:35.95pt } .sD8E76205 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sB1F34DFD { height:40pt } .s4F916575 { height:38.55pt } .s7F2E4500 { height:39.1pt } .s308E6575 { height:39.75pt } .s9CEB4500 { height:38.9pt } .s30CC6575 { height:39.55pt } .s7F914500 { height:39.4pt } .s4EF26575 { height:38.65pt } .sBD5C6575 { height:36.25pt } .sF27C6D70 { height:40.25pt } .sC7CF2F38 { height:39pt } .s4DA46575 { height:38.85pt } .s306B6575 { height:39.45pt } .s9E144500 { height:38.6pt } .s2FA96575 { height:39.25pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 27078/15 Aida ŽIŠKO against Bosnia and Herzegovina and 17 other applications (see list appended)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 14   February 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the date indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. They were all represented before the Court by Ms H.   Kapetan, a lawyer practising in Travnik. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of the Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions were communicated to the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Government”). On 10   December 2018 the applicants informed the Registry that they wanted to withdraw their applications to the Court since out-of-court settlements had been reached with the debtor. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 7 March 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of the Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions)   No. Application no. Date of Introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth 1. 27078/15 26/05/2015 Aida Žiško 27/05/1961 2. 27081/15 26/05/2015 Ibrahim Horić 23/09/1961 3. 27304/15 26/05/2015 Jasmina Tanović 21/09/1953 4. 27309/15 26/05/2015 Fedina Ljubunčić 01/03/1961 5. 27312/15 26/05/2015 Suad Zijadić 20/05/1960 6. 27328/15 26/05/2015 Zahida Memišević 26/06/1957 7. 27334/15 26/05/2015 Elvedin Drakovac 01/11/1972 8. 27344/15 26/05/2015 Irfan Gazdić 06/04/1983 9. 27345/15 26/05/2015 Amel Merdžanović 18/02/1980 10. 27401/15 26/05/2015 Elmaza Čekić 03/03/1959 11. 27404/15 26/05/2015 Nazim Lapjani 21/03/1968 12. 27428/15 26/05/2015 Sabina Hrenovica 04/08/1981 13. 27432/15 26/05/2015 Muhiba Arnautović 05/01/1956 14. 27434/15 26/05/2015 Azur Botulja 13/07/1981 15. 27439/15 26/05/2015 Safet Šehović 13/12/1972 16. 27442/15 26/05/2015 Esad Amin 15/02/1962 17. 27445/15 26/05/2015 Midhat Karić 29/09/1975 18. 27447/15 26/05/2015 Indira Čaušević 19/06/1964