CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 février 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 29613/16 János Karen SCHRONK against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 14   February 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 7 March 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth / Date of registration Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     29613/16 23/05/2016 János Karen Schronk 13/06/1981 Payrich András Budapest   17/01/2019 28/09/2018 3,900     40835/16 05/07/2016 Hotel Festal Kft 14/12/2007 Érdi Kék Tó 1999 Kft 01/07/1999       18/01/2019 28/08/2018 5,000     50805/16 23/08/2016 Istvánné Takács 05/02/1948 Mester Csaba Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 16/01/2019 18/07/2018 3,500     51263/16 23/08/2016 Household István Takács 11/04/1974 Balázs Takács 26/03/1976     Mester Csaba Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 17/01/2019 19/07/2018 2,500     54938/17 24/07/2017 (13 applicants) Imrene Karolyi 09/11/1931   István DÉNES 02/05/1958 Balintne BALOGH 21/08/1953 Aranka JANOSANE FEKETE 29/12/1959 Janos NAGY 21/01/1945 Zoltan NAGY 15/08/1975 Henrikne FENYVESI 26/09/1948 Lajos PENTEK 14/07/1942 Balazs GOLENT 12/09/1975 Andras GOLENT 11/08/1978 Janos BOGAROMI 25/09/1955 Laszlo UBRIK 19/06/1957 Margit Hajnalka BARTL 24/12/1947     Czirmes György Budapest   09/01/2019 13/07/2018 3,800     64600/17 26/08/2017 Zsuzsanna Lábodi 28/05/1965 Csonka Balázs Csopak Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings –   15/01/2019 26/06/2018 6,000     76982/17 30/10/2017 György Hevesi 26/02/1939 Kmetty Ildikó Vác   17/01/2019 16/07/2018 8,000     5627/18 18/01/2018 Andrea Meretei 29/10/1966     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 16/01/2019 04/07/2018 13,000     19710/18 21/04/2018 (26 applicants) Jánosné Tóka 10/03/1957 Lászlóné MISETA 02/06/1951 Istvánné KOVÁCS 02/06/1965 Gyula Istvánné BÓKA 24/08/1970 Lajosné BADITZ 24/04/1949 Zoltán TORMA 22/07/1947 Lajos TORMA 17/02/1951 Andrásné KOVÁCS 16/11/1958 Endre KENYÉR 12/04/1948 Zoltán KENYÉR 27/01/1953 Lajos NAGY 24/01/1978 Józsefné SZAKÁLY 25/10/1949 Györgyné FEJES 02/02/1949 Jánosné CSIZMADIA 05/11/1942 Lajos CSÁSZÁR 19/08/1959 János CSÁSZÁR 08/04/1954 Zoltán Béláné SÁRVÁRI 23/04/1950 Lajos CSÁSZÁR 30/06/1952 Attila László ROSTA 18/04/1967 Istvánné BÁLINT 07/07/1965 Zoltán ROSTA 12/12/1956 Erika HORVÁTH 06/06/1962 Tamás József KIRÁLY 13/08/1970 Jánosné FIGURA 19/08/1960   Györgyi FÜLÖPNÉ KIRÁLY 06/09/1973 Zoltán NAGY 15/08/1975 Czirmes György Budapest   09/01/2019 06/08/2018 8,300   20070/18 20/04/2018 Dávid Márton László 27/11/1977 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 07/01/2019 02/08/2018 3,300   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.