CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 mars 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307DEC003414017
- Date
- 7 mars 2019
- Publication
- 7 mars 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s761D06F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:11pt } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s98AB28CD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA2E08F25 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD33 { font-family:Arial; font-size:7pt }   THIRD SECTION DECISION This version was rectified on 7 August 2019 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court. Application no. 34140/17 Vladimir Aleksandrovich KREKOTNEV against Russia and 16 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 7   March 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 28 March 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     34140/17 20/04/2017 Vladimir Aleksandrovich Krekotnev 03/04/1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 03/04/2018 01/06/2018 4,500     44777/17 16/06/2017 Viktor Gennadyevich Sokolov 07/07/1956     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 16/01/2018 23/02/2018 5,000     73931/17 29/09/2017 Maksim Yuryevich Aristov 22/08/1983 Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 16/07/2018 18/09/2018 4,500     79364/17 07/11/2017 Roman Ivanovich Moldoratov 08/05/1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 15/05/2018 02/07/2018 5,850     79612/17 11/11/2017 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich Mikolaychuk 13/10/1977       15/05/2018 11/07/2018 4,500     81562/17 23/11/2017 Timofey Nikolayevich Domnitskiy 04/10/1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 22/05/2018 23/07/2018 4,500     609/18 02/12/2017 Ivan Aleksandrovich Bogdanov 26/05/1992     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 24/07/2018 18/09/2018 4,500     1287/18 03/12/2017 Andrey Vasilyevich Obukhov 07/10/1980     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 24/07/2018 01/10/2018 4,500     2495/18 19/12/2017 Yuliya Aleksandrovna Kozachenko 30/12/1982 Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 16/07/2018 18/09/2018 4,500   3351/18 19/12/2017 Yevgeniy Gennadyevich Gertsev 29/08/1976       14/09/2018 09/11/2018 4,500   3502/18 11/12/2017 Sergey Vitalyevich Boginskiy 21/08/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 16/07/2018 01/10/2018 4,500   3621/18 29/12/2017 Petr Aleksandrovich Larionov [2] 21/10/1968 Born Aleksandr Viktorovich Kineshma Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 16/07/2018 26/09/2018 4,500   3783/18 12/12/2017 Viktor Svetoslavovich Zuyev 07/01/1979     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 23/07/2018 27/09/2018 4,500   4981/18 15/12/2017 Sergey Sergeyevich Kislykh 23/04/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 14/09/2018 14/11/2018 4,500   6105/18 15/01/2018 Gennadiy Sergeyevich Antonov 17/01/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 24/07/2018 03/10/2018 4,500   7481/18 11/01/2018 Vasiliy Mikhaylovich Zarutskiy 20/03/1981 Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 16/07/2018 18/09/2018 4,500   7852/18 29/01/2018 Aleksandr Nikolayevich Vishnyakov 11/09/1964 Vinogradov Aleksandr Vladimirovich Kostroma Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 14/09/2018 11/10/2018 4,500   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] .     Rectified on 7 August 2019: the date of birth was "04/10/1982”Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 7 mars 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307DEC003414017
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral