CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 mars 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s2D726B78 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .s38729B7C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 78492/17 Mária TÓTHNÉ MAJOR and Others against Hungary (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 7   March 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 4   November 2013, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Mr G. Czirmes, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In respect of the applicants Ms Sándorné Klonka, Ms Mária Magdolna Várkonyi, Mr László Durgó and Ms Gyöngyi Szép, the Court observes that they were not parties to the impugned domestic proceedings. In respect of the other applicants, the Court received friendly ‑ settlement declarations under which those applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case in this regard. THE LAW As regards the applicants Ms Sándorné Klonka, Ms Mária Magdolna Várkonyi, Mr László Durgó and Ms Gyöngyi Szép, who were not party to the relevant domestic proceedings, the application is incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) and must be rejected, pursuant to Article   35 § 4 of the Convention. As regards the other applicants, the Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list for these applicants. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to declare the complaints of the applicants Ms Sándorné Klonka, Ms Mária Magdolna Várkonyi, Mr László Durgó and Ms Gyöngyi Szép inadmissible; and Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention as concerns the other applicants. Done in English and notified in writing on 28 March 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1] 78492/17 04/11/2013 (110 applicants) Household Mária Tóthné Major 11/04/1953 András Tóth 16/04/1952   Jenőné Altfatter 17/07/1944   Tibor Altfatter 23/01/1968   Barbara Andrási 31/01/1961   Erika Árkai 18/07/1957   Vilmosné Balavány 14/04/1942   Sándorné Balázs 11/07/1959   János Balogh 14/08/1943     Endre Cseszkó 31/07/1984   Ferenc Csorba 12/01/1943   Jozsefné Galló 01/11/1936   András Guller 05/04/1948   Zsolt Gyimóthy 20/08/1969   Éva Katalin Gyuricáné Kiss 14/09/1966   Gáborné Hegyes 12/09/1968   Gyula Holubek 31/03/1972   Zsuzsanna Honéczi 26/01/1948   Istvánné Horváth 13/08/1957   Melinda Horváth 03/06/1982   Klára Jaszberényi 24/07/1948   Ilona Kemenczei 30/06/1955   Gyula Kertész 24/02/1951   Miklósné Kis 08/05/1952   Anna Éva Kissné Bozsó 25/04/1960   Zoltán Klekner 25/10/1962   Katalin Kolbay 12/11/1955   Beáta Kozma 14/09/1966   Antal Kunsági 29/11/1946   Mária Lajos 25/03/1942   Gábor Lenárd 02/02/1955   Ferenc Lengyel 08/10/1932   Judit Ligetiné Altfatter 18/04/1970   Katalin Luzsi 26/05/1956   Andrea Magyarné Kőrösi 04/03/1970   Katalin Martincsekné Kolinek 20/07/1950   Tibor Mester 31/07/1977   Szabolcs Mészáros 14/10/1948   Ágnes Szilvia Molnárné Major 12/11/1970   Albertné Nagy 15/02/1943   Gábor Nagy 20/05/1965   Zoltán Nagy 31/07/1985   Beatrix Orbánné Andrási 14/09/1974   Mária Orémusz 20/02/1951   Veronika Orosz 12/05/1938   Lajos Paczolai 15/04/1938   Konstantin Paksi 08/05/1975   Rudolfné Perczel 05/10/1949   Katalin Pók 28/04/1944   Ferenc Radványi 17/09/1977   Mária Rényi 03/10/1949   Kinga Rita Rózsa 27/07/1984   Emil Selmeczi 21/12/1941   Sándorné Soós 10/04/1948   Frigyesné Sperl 02/09/1930   Márta Adrienn Sperl 17/09/1957   Ottó Sperl 20/05/1962   Éva Szalainé Vaderna 13/08/1940   Ingrid Szénégető 06/12/1975   Ágnes Zsuzsanna Szőllősi 23/09/1951   Péterné Takács 09/02/1944   Éva Vörös 31/03/1957   Károlyné Zoles 10/02/1948   Household Kálmán Szondi 19/05/1963 Kálmánné Szondi   Household Attila Tamás Sándor 18/02/1983 Máté László Sándor 13/07/1987   Household Alajos Sándor 05/04/1935 Alajosné Sándor 14/01/1934   Household Imre Nagy 20/02/1928 Imréné Nagy 15/02/1934   Household Károly Tolnai 07/11/1954 Károlyné Tolnai 12/07/1955           Household Géza Szabó 16/04/1939 Gézáné Szabó 18/03/1940   Household József Földesi 27/02/1926 Józsefné Földesi 15/09/1929   Household István Kovács 06/05/1941 Istvánné Kovács 11/03/1945   Household Kálmán Kállai 15/10/1947 Kálmánné Kállai 31/03/1954   Household László Unger 08/04/1940 Lászlóné Unger 10/10/1938   Household Ferenc Papp 23/06/1947 Ferencné Papp 03/09/1948         Household László Szabó 03/05/1944 Laszlóné Szabó 07/04/1947   Household István Sáthy 23/01/1939 Istvánné Sáthy 18/09/1941   Household Erzsébet Janurik 18/07/1970 Jánosné Janurik 10/02/1936   Household László Zahorecz 29/01/1946 Lászlóné Zahorecz 09/02/1950   Household Iván Bernát 14/03/1950 Ivánné Bernát 02/02/1952   Household Attila Lendvai 02/11/1937 Attiláné Lendvai 31/01/1940 Katalin Lendvai 06/02/1966     Household Sándor Kovács 05/11/1944 Sándorné Kovács 09/02/1943   Household Sándor Papp 08/06/1967 Sándorné Papp 10/09/1940   Household László Jenő Tóth 01/04/1958 Ilona Katalin Tóthné Ács 07/09/1954   Household Ágnes Tóth 09/09/1982 Károly Tóth 31/07/1978 24/09/2018 06/02/2018 3,000 Sándorné Klonka 21/01/1943   Mária Magdolna Várkonyi 01/09/1944   László Durgó 31/12/1961   Gyöngyi Szép 04/03/1975 -- -- 0   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.