CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 mars 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .sBE89E49F { width:149.19pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sB993B0A7 { height:16.15pt } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 31753/14 László GRÓF and others against Hungary and 10 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 21   March 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In application no.   32387/18, the applicant’s complaint based on the same facts was also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 April 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     31753/14 11/04/2014 (11 applicants) László Gróf 24/02/1957 Ferenc GYÜKÉR 22/12/1964 József KALÓ 10/09/1939 József Sándorné LÉRÁNT 04/07/1945 Edit Zsuzsanna ORMAY 06/01/1948   György ORMAY b:08/04/1934 d:07/03/2018   Pursued by heir Imréné György ORMAY 01/06/1933   Béla Sándor PATÓCS 20/05/1952 Antalné PEZENHOFFER 20/05/1936 Zsolt SAMU 09/06/1964 Gábor Józsefné SZABO 20/06/1954 Gábor VARGA 21/02/1964       10/01/2019 03/01/2019 6,000     56895/15 11/11/2015 Ferenc Pajkó 03/04/1965 Attila DUDÁS 24/08/1974 Kovács Arthur Szeged   25/02/2019 06/08/2018 2,500     61112/15 13/11/2015 Violetta Eszter Fodor 09/10/1972       29/01/2019 25/07/2018 3,500     73590/17 06/10/2017 Zsuzsa Dénes 21/04/1983 Gila Pál Budapest   29/01/2019 18/09/2018 5,000     84351/17 15/12/2017 Tünde Dömsödi 15/09/1976 Stern Sándor Szentes   28/01/2019 08/10/2018 8,000     2959/18 29/12/2017 Sándor Balatonfüredi 03/08/1964 József Balatonfüredi 16/10/1961 Tóth Balázs Gergely Budapest   25/01/2019 08/10/2018 2,500     5260/18 15/01/2018 (4 applicants) Ilona Krisztina Gombos-Molnár 07/08/1976 Nikoletta SINKÓ 13/04/1976 Klára VÁGI 07/09/1972 Bernadett ZELEI 23/07/1978 Gémes Gábor Szeged   28/01/2019 17/08/2018 8,000     5884/18 12/01/2018 Eva Snejana Kovatch 10/10/1958 Karsai Dániel András Budapest   25/02/2019 06/12/2018 7,000     30033/18 15/06/2018 Csilla Daróczi 10/07/1962       25/01/2019 18/12/2018 6,000   32387/18 05/07/2018 László Burján 06/01/1960 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings –   25/01/2019 19/12/2018 5,000   41906/18 03/05/2018 (28 applicants) Erzsébet Molnár 28/05/1977 Mária Bekó 03/10/1983 Béla Árpádné Csapó 23/05/1946 Ferenc Csernyik 20/12/1944 Pál József Csernyik 20/03/1942 József Csizmadia 26/07/1935 László Mihály Deák 20/07/1944 Józsefné Farkas 30/08/1966 Ottó Béláné Frey 07/07/1948 Oszkár Jánosné Füzesi 29/09/1945 László Jánosné Gáspár 19/01/1949 Tiborné Németh 18/10/1937 Judit Palkóne Szőcs 22/04/1968 Béláné Sárkány 02/10/1944 Andrásné Sas 12/11/1942 Mária Katalin Sebeházi 28/05/1950 Miklósné Simkó 24/02/1944 Pálné Sinka 12/09/1936 Ferenc Szarvas 14/06/1956 Ferenc Szőcs 24/10/1979 Vince Szőcs 01/02/1942 Ferenc Török 03/08/1935 István Ferenc Varga 03/09/1963 László Varga 02/07/1959 Mária Varga 08/07/196   Vendelné Varga b:05/12/1924 d:29/08/2017   pursued by heirs: Béla Árpádné Csapó 23/05/1946 Ottó Béláné Frey 07/07/1948   Household Gabriella Szarvas 16/05/1977 László Szarvas 17/04/1975   Hangyál Edit Budapest   25/02/2019 09/01/2019 2,800   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.