CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 4 avril 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s98AB28CD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 25013/17 Yevgeniy Leonidovich RYBALKO against Russia and 14 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 4   April 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention during transport. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 9 May 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     25013/17 15/03/2017 Yevgeniy Leonidovich Rybalko 19/05/1974       27/03/2018 17/05/2018 1,000     54571/17 20/07/2017 Maksim Aleksandrovich Lapko 19/07/1979       27/03/2018 27/04/2018 1,000     59996/17 07/08/2017 Vurgun Gulmirzayevich Kuliyev 29/05/1974     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law – to complain about inadequate conditions of transport 27/03/2018 09/05/2018 1,000     62567/17 03/08/2017 Aleksandr Nikolayevich Smirnov 22/08/1983 Vinogradov Aleksandr Vladimirovich Kostroma   27/03/2018 09/05/2018 1,000     70565/17 07/09/2017 Petr Petrovich   Neprin 12/04/1969       27/03/2018 19/06/2018 1,000     5517/18 11/01/2018 Denis Anatolyevich Korablev 06/04/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law – to complain about inadequate conditions of transport 17/09/2018 08/11/2018 1,000     5887/18 09/01/2018 Yuriy Yuryevich Kazaryan 21/07/1969     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law – to complain about inadequate conditions of transport 17/09/2018 12/11/2018 1,000     6589/18 11/01/2018 Aleksandr Fedorovich Burik 23/06/1976           17/09/2018 26/11/2018 1,000     6606/18 15/01/2018 Sergey Vladimirovich Sukhov 18/04/1980     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law – to complain about inadequate conditions of transport 17/09/2018 26/02/2019 1,000   6653/18 12/12/2017 Aleksey Nikolayevich Podyachev 20/06/1977     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law – to complain about inadequate conditions of transport 17/09/2018 30/11/2018 1,000   9946/18 01/02/2018 Konstantin Ivanovich Vokuyev 01/07/1986 Kovaleva Yana Viktorovna Kazan   19/09/2018 13/11/2018 1,000   12006/18 28/02/2018 Yevgeniy Yuryevich Kotrutsa 26/09/1988 Malinin Andrey Anatolyevich Pechora   19/09/2018 12/11/2018 1,000   12886/18 19/02/2018 Sergey Vladimirovich Sukhov 18/04/1980     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about inadequate conditions of transport 19/09/2018 09/11/2018 1,000   14268/18 13/03/2018 Nikolay Alekseyevich Mamontov 05/10/1978 Malinin Andrey Anatolyevich Pechora Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law – to complain about inadequate conditions of transport 19/09/2018 09/11/2018 1,000   22738/18 28/04/2018 Umedzhon Muminovich Makhkamov 19/01/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law – to complain about inadequate conditions of transport 16/10/2018 15/01/2019 1,000   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.