CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG25
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 4 avril 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0404DEC003858706
- Date
- 4 avril 2019
- Publication
- 4 avril 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sCF589882 { width:157.77pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 38587/06 Luigi SERINO against Italy   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 4   April 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Aleš Pejchal, President,   Jovan Ilievski,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 22 September 2006, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Luigi Serino, was an Italian national who was born in   1925 and lived in Benevento. He died on 2 January 2009. The applicant’s heirs, Mr Filippo Serino and Mrs Lucia Serino, informed the Court that they wished to pursue the application in the late applicant’s stead and that Mr   Filippo Serino had been conferred a general power of attorney by his sister Mrs   Lucia Serino to act on her behalf. The applicant was represented before the Court by Mr S. Ferrara, a lawyer practising in Benevento. The applicant’s complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, that the deprivation of his property through the application of the constructive ‑ expropriation rule (“ accessione invertita ” or “ occupazione acquisitiva ”) by the domestic courts violated his property rights, was communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”). On 18   February 2019 Mr Ferrara informed the Registry that the heirs no longer wished to pursue the application before the Court following an out ‑ of ‑ court settlement with the Benevento Municipality. He enclosed a signed declaration by Mr Serino to this effect. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 9 May 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Aleš Pejchal   Acting Deputy Registrar   President    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 25
- Date
- 4 avril 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0404DEC003858706
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral