CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 16 mai 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s8BB6D734 { margin-right:9pt; margin-left:9pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .s56AF4627 { height:61.9pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4B55D7A { height:25.05pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 12086/14 Dumitru MARDARE against Romania and 11 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 16   May 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). By letters sent by registered post on the dates indicated in the appended table the applicants were invited to inform the Court about any developments or changes in their situation at the domestic level. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 6 June 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Date of the applicant’s last letter Date of the Court’s registered letter   Date of receipt of the registered letter Time-limit for submission by the applicant of the information requested 1. 12086/14 27/12/2013 Dumitru Mardare 23/03/1955   12/01/2016 24/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 15/03/2019 21/02/2019 2. 6367/15 16/02/2015 Cristian-Georgel Alexandru 28/07/1979 26/07/2016 24/01/2019 01/02/2019 21/02/2019 3. 20801/15 15/04/2015 Ionuț Samara 27/10/1988 15/04/2015 16/01/2019 23/01/2019 13/02/2019 4. 37562/15 21/07/2015 Vlăduț Mihai 27/03/1973 04/01/2016 23/01/2019 29/01/2019 20/02/2019 5. 40049/15 15/03/2016 Florin Bratu 16/10/1991 23/08/2016 16/01/2019 22/01/2019 13/02/2019 6. 52292/16 04/12/2015     Nicolae-Eugen Lixandru 01/07/1976 11/05/2016 22/01/2019 06/02/2019 19/02/2019 7. 52613/15 25/07/2016   Ionuț-Vasile Jurje 08/05/1986 25/07/2016 17/01/2019 22/01/2019 14/02/2019 8. 52912/15 19/11/2015 Cătălin-Ionuț Mămăligaru 08/03/1983 18/07/2017 23/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 19/02/2019 20/02/2019 9. 52929/15 09/11/2015 Valentin Coșerin 16/03/1976 13/07/2017 25/01/2019 05/02/2019 22/02/2019 10. 55164/15 23/12/2015 Andrei-Vasile Mărincean 16/09/1990 01/03/2016 25/01/2019 07/02/2019 22/02/2019 11. 55785/15 18/04/2016 Jeno Kovács 05/10/1968 18/04/2016 22/01/2019 28/01/2019 19/02/2019 12.   56787/15 08/12/2015 Giuliano-George Ventri 28/09/1981 20/06/2017 22/01/2019 05/02/2019 19/02/2019